python / python/cpython

macOS: abortive close (SO_LINGER {1,0}) of a flow-controlled loopback socket occasionally loses the RST, hanging asyncio peers

Open
#153,117 3 comments 1 reaction 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

OS-mac topic-socket type-bug
Dominant language
Python
Stars
77.2k
Forks
35.9k
PR merge metrics
PR metrics pending

Description

Summary

On macOS, when a flow-controlled (zero receive window) loopback TCP connection is abortively closedsetsockopt(SO_LINGER, {1, 0}) then close() — the reset (RST) is occasionally never delivered to the peer. The peer's socket stays ESTABLISHED forever: its registered reader never fires, getpeername() still succeeds, SO_ERROR == 0, and recv(..., MSG_PEEK) returns EWOULDBLOCK. The connection is left half-open.

The closing side is textbook-correct at close() time (still connected, SO_LINGER set to {1,0}, unsent bytes in the send buffer), and its fd is released cleanly (lsof confirms no lingering fd). So per POSIX/BSD semantics close() must emit a RST — but the peer never sees it, nor a FIN.

This surfaces as a permanent, silent hang of otherwise-correct asyncio programs on macOS. It is ultimately a macOS kernel lost-RST (it reproduces with plain selectors, no asyncio), but asyncio's normal teardown pattern makes it markedly more frequent — see below.

Reproducer

Full runnable reproducers + red CI on macOS: https://github.com/graingert/asyncio-macos-loopback-rst-hang

Three variants, all stdlib-only:

  • repro.py — asyncio (loop.add_reader/add_writer + a call_soon-deferred abortive close)
  • repro_selectors.py — plain selectors, immediate close
  • repro_selectors_deferred.py — plain selectors, close deferred by one poll cycle

Each iteration: establish a loopback pair; the server never reads so the client's writes drive the window to zero and fill its send buffer; register the client fd, fill until send() blocks; unregister and abortively close the client; register the server and wait for the disconnect. If the disconnect never arrives within a timeout, the RST was lost.

Results (single ~10-minute CI run per cell; undelivered / total)

variant macOS 14 macOS 15 Linux
asyncio (deferred close) 19 / 1.46M 4 / 0.93M 0 / 1.1M
selectors, immediate close 5 / 1.55M 0 / 1.16M 0 / 1.3M
selectors, deferred close 21 / 1.89M 1 / 1.27M 0 / 1.3M

Rates are low (~1–13 per million) and noisy, so an occasional 0 does not mean "cannot reproduce."

Analysis

  1. It is not an asyncio logic bug — it reproduces with a plain selectors (KqueueSelector) loop and no asyncio (macOS 14, immediate close). The underlying lost RST is macOS kernel behavior.
  2. The deferred close amplifies it ~3–4×. "Deferred close" = a select()/kqueue poll cycle runs between unregistering the fd and abortively closing it:
    unregister(fd)  ->  select()  ->  setsockopt(SO_LINGER {1,0}); close(fd)
    
    The immediate-close variant (unregister(fd); close(fd) with no poll between) hits it much less often.
  3. asyncio always inserts that poll cycle, because a transport's close()/abort is deferred to a later loop iteration via call_soon. That is why asyncio programs on macOS hit this most, and hang permanently when they do (loop.sock_recv / a registered reader that never fires).
  4. Never observed on Linux (epoll) across many millions of iterations.

Environment

  • macOS 14 and macOS 15 (GitHub-hosted macos-14 / macos-15 runners, Apple Silicon), CPython 3.13.
  • Reproduces on the default SelectorEventLoop (KqueueSelector).
  • Does not reproduce on Linux.

Not a duplicate of

  • #77444 — "Asyncio server enters an invalid state after a request with SO_LINGER" (server-side accept/state; not a lost RST).
  • #71573 — "Asyncio server hang when clients connect and immediately disconnect" (server-side hang; different mechanism).

Those are server-side; this is a client-side abortive close whose RST is lost, leaving the peer half-open.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start with repro.py and repro_selectors.py in the linked reproducer repository, then compare the asyncio deferred-close path with the plain selectors variants on macOS. The issue does not identify a CPython change to make; a useful outcome would need to establish whether a CPython-side mitigation exists or document the macOS kernel limitation, with the reproducer validating the result.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
macos, python
Domain
networking
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
28/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.