python / python/cpython

`__future__` imports aren't always eager

未關閉
#151,577 2 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 1 人 在 GitHub 檢視

@brandtbucher 已經在處理了。

開始於 2026年6月17日。

3.15 3.16 interpreter-core topic-lazy-imports topic-parser type-bug
主要語言
Python
星號
77.2k
分支
36k
平均合併
1 天 9 小時
30 天內合併 PR
558

描述

Bug report

It's my understanding that __future__ imports are always supposed to be eager. PEP 810 even goes so far as to specifically exclude lazy from __future__ import ... syntax:

No, future imports can’t be lazy because they’re parser/compiler directives. It’s technically possible for the runtime behavior to be lazy but there’s no real value in it.

However, the current implementation on 3.15 and main does allow __future__ imports to become lazy when lazy imports are globally enabled:

% ./python.exe -c 'from __future__ import annotations; print(globals()["annotations"])'                      
_Feature((3, 7, 0, 'beta', 1), None, 16777216)
% PYTHON_LAZY_IMPORTS=all ./python.exe -c 'from __future__ import annotations; print(globals()["annotations"])'
<lazy_import '__future__.annotations'>

I have a patch that flags these imports as not-lazy-eligible in the bytecode compiler (similar to * imports, imports in try blocks, and non-module-level imports). Backporting this fix to 3.15 would require bumping the bytecode magic number, though (it can be checked at runtime, but that likely introduces some overhead). Just thought I'd check to make sure my understanding is correct here and that this is indeed a bug.

貢獻指南

開啟貢獻指南

從這裡開始

  1. 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
  3. Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
  4. 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。

評估

這個 Issue 還沒有評估資料。

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。