python / python/cpython

`__future__` imports aren't always eager

未关闭
#151,577 2 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 1 人 在 GitHub 查看

@brandtbucher 已经在做这个了。

开始于 2026年6月17日。

3.15 3.16 interpreter-core topic-lazy-imports topic-parser type-bug
主要语言
Python
星标
77.2k
派生
35.9k
PR 合并指标
PR 指标待抓取

描述

Bug report

It's my understanding that __future__ imports are always supposed to be eager. PEP 810 even goes so far as to specifically exclude lazy from __future__ import ... syntax:

No, future imports can’t be lazy because they’re parser/compiler directives. It’s technically possible for the runtime behavior to be lazy but there’s no real value in it.

However, the current implementation on 3.15 and main does allow __future__ imports to become lazy when lazy imports are globally enabled:

% ./python.exe -c 'from __future__ import annotations; print(globals()["annotations"])'                      
_Feature((3, 7, 0, 'beta', 1), None, 16777216)
% PYTHON_LAZY_IMPORTS=all ./python.exe -c 'from __future__ import annotations; print(globals()["annotations"])'
<lazy_import '__future__.annotations'>

I have a patch that flags these imports as not-lazy-eligible in the bytecode compiler (similar to * imports, imports in try blocks, and non-module-level imports). Backporting this fix to 3.15 would require bumping the bytecode magic number, though (it can be checked at runtime, but that likely introduces some overhead). Just thought I'd check to make sure my understanding is correct here and that this is indeed a bug.

贡献指南

打开贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

评估

这个 Issue 还没有评估数据。

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。