python / python/cpython

Relax `PyUnstable_SetImmortal` to objects allocated in that thread?

未關閉
#150,865 25 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 1 人 在 GitHub 檢視

@ZeroIntensity 已經在處理了。

開始於 2026年9月7日。

interpreter-core topic-C-API topic-free-threading type-feature
主要語言
Python
星號
77.2k
分支
36k
PR 合併指標
PR 指標待擷取

描述

Feature or enhancement

Proposal:

Currently PyUnstable_SetImmortal requires a uniquely referenced object. I think the docs could be a bit clearer about this but that isn't the tricky part.

The tricky part is that I think it doesn't seem uncommon to create objects which are not uniquely referenced. I have two overlapping places in NumPy where I was hope to use this while making types that were previously static to heaptypes:

  1. If you have non-trivial setup code that might fail you want to immortalize at the very end. In my case I wanted to add the object to a dict (as a last step). (Sure, if I am going to immortalize it, then I can re-order adding it to the dict with a lock or so.)
  2. I am using PyType_FromMetaType() and the returned object already has 3 references when created fresh.

Basically, I get the "err on the safe side" part, but from poking it a bit and looking at https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/113956 it seems that the real limitation seems to be that the current thread owns the object.

Ensuring the object is created on the current thread is trivial no matter how complicated object creation itself is.

CC @ngoldbaum

Has this already been discussed elsewhere?

No response given

Links to previous discussion of this feature:

No response

Linked PRs
  • gh-150956

貢獻指南

開啟貢獻指南

從這裡開始

  1. 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
  3. Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
  4. 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。

評估

這個 Issue 還沒有評估資料。

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。