datetime: Comparision and subtraction of datetime objects does not account for DST changes
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 77.2k
- Forks
- 35.9k
- PR merge metrics
- PR metrics pending
Description
Bug report
Bug description:
The documentation of datetime ordering predicates says both that "datetime1 is considered less than datetime2 when datetime1 precedes datetime2 in time, taking into account the time zone" but also "If both comparands are aware, and have the same tzinfo attribute, the tzinfo and fold attributes are ignored"
I believe that ignoring fold, though documented, is incorrect, and contradicts the earlier "precedes ... in time" explanation of what the expression dt1 < dt2 means. If avoiding a conversion to UTC is an important performance optimization, a possibility is to continue to avoid it provided that the fold= and tzinfo= values are the same in both comparands.
>>> from datetime import datetime
>>> import zoneinfo
>>> la = zoneinfo.ZoneInfo("America/Los_Angeles")
>>> t1 = datetime.fromtimestamp(1604221200.0, tz=la)
>>> t2 = datetime.fromtimestamp(1604217660.0, tz=la)
>>> t1 < t2
True
>>> t1.timestamp() < t2.timestamp()
False
Tested on: 3.13.5, 3.15.0a2
CPython versions tested on:
3.15
Operating systems tested on:
Linux
Linked PRs
- gh-146294
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Reproduce the documented datetime comparison and subtraction behavior with the America/Los_Angeles zoneinfo examples and inspect the datetime.datetime ordering and subtraction entry points. Compare the results with timestamp ordering and the stated documentation semantics; done means the behavior and documentation agree across the DST fold case, with relevant regression coverage.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- backend
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100