Performance TODOs
まだ誰も着手していません。
- 主要言語
- Python
- スター
- 77.2k
- フォーク
- 35.9k
- PR マージ指標
- PR 指標を取得中
説明
[!IMPORTANT]
This is a meta issue listing possible performance improvements that:
- are not too hard, but they aren't easy either: a knowledge of computer science is necessary.
- do not involving original research, or changes to multiple parts of the VM.
- should produce a worthwhile performance improvement
- are self contained:
- Not increasing coupling or complexity in the code base
- Can be worked on without troublesome merge conflicts
Since this is a meta issue, please make sure there is an issue for the sub-issue before working on it.
In no particular order:
Convert basic blocks to extended basic blocks in the bytecode compiler
Many local optimizations in the bytecode compiler are limited to a single basic block, but would be more effective and still correct applied to extended basic blocks.
Better conversion of LOAD_FAST to LOAD_FAST_BORROW in the bytecode compiler
For example,
>>> def f(a,b):
... return a if a < b else b
>>> dis.dis(f)
1 RESUME 0
2 LOAD_FAST_BORROW_LOAD_FAST_BORROW 1 (a, b)
COMPARE_OP 18 (bool(<))
POP_JUMP_IF_FALSE 3 (to L1)
NOT_TAKEN
LOAD_FAST_BORROW 0 (a)
RETURN_VALUE
L1: LOAD_FAST 1 (b)
RETURN_VALUE
It is possible that extended basic blocks would fix this, or it might be a separate problem
Replace with _CHECK_STACK_SPACE with _CHECK_STACK_SPACE_OPERAND in the JIT
We removed the optimization that did this because it tried to convert multiple _CHECK_STACK_SPACEs into a single _CHECK_STACK_SPACE_OPERAND. Replacing them one by one should be much simpler.
Function, and maybe code, watchers
We have class and dictionary watchers, and we use them effectively in the JIT. There are a number of optimizations we would like to do, but cannot because functions and code objects can change at runtime and we don't have watchers for them.
We might not need code watchers, as we do a complete de-optimization when any code objects are instrumented. Having code watchers might allow more targetted de-optimizations. We should do function watchers first though.
Track which locals are NULL/immortal/borrowed in the bytecode compiler
We could them use this information to speedup RETURN_VALUE as it wouldn't need to DECREF those locals. This might make sense in the interpreter, but would probably only be of value in the JIT.
Reduce or eliminate the cost of updating the insertion order when initializing an object with STORE_ATTR_INSTANCE_VALUE
STORE_ATTR_INSTANCE_VALUE does three things
- Stores the new value
- Maybe decrefs the refcount on the old values
- Updates the insertion order array
Updating the insertion order array is possibly the most expensive part of this, and could be easily optimised.
We could:
- Instead of recording the position, record the delta from the "natural" position. In many cases this would be zero and we could skip the write
- In the JIT determine cases where we would make no write and eliminate the code for that.
Optimize reference tracking and eliminate branching during returns and yields
https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/144540
Optimize _LOAD_SPECIAL to a type check and constant load.
The instruction LOAD_SPECIAL expands to uop sequence _INSERT_NULL + _LOAD_SPECIAL which can be optimized to _GUARD_TYPE_VERSION + _LOAD_CONST_INLINE + _SWAP 2
Linked PRs
- gh-144414
コントリビューションガイド
はじめの一歩
- issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
- 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
- リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
- issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。
調査の方向性
これはバイトコードコンパイラとJITにおける複数の独立した最適化を扱うメタイシューであり、ファイルやテストは指定していません。まずリンク先の作業を確認し、1つの項目専用のサブイシューを作成するか見つけてください。関連するコンパイラまたはJITのエントリポイントを読み、ベンチマークを用意してください。完了の条件は、結合を増やしたり扱いにくいマージコンフリクトを招いたりせずに、対象を絞った測定可能なパフォーマンス改善を実現することです。
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
評価
- 技術スタック
- python
- 領域
- compilers, performance
- issue の種類
- 機能追加
- 難易度
- 5/5
- 見積もり時間
- 1週間以上
- 活発さ
- 停滞
- 明瞭さ
- 説明が足りない
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 20/100