Fix portability of `sendfile(2)` support detection for Lustre filesystems
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 77.2k
- Forks
- 35.9k
- PR merge metrics
- PR metrics pending
Description
Bug report
Bug description:
On Lustre on Linux (specifically the AWS implementation) there is a rare and difficult to reproduce failure of shutil.copyfile in its sendfile(2) fast path because the syscall returns ENODATA. The situation is recoverable by falling back to the standard read/write file copy (patch forthcoming).
Reproducing the bug requires the filesystem to be in a specific state which I have not been able to reproduce at will but we've seen it on occasions by multiple users. Additionally similar bug has been seen on rust fs::copy which similarly does not trap the ENODATA error.
Following is sufficient to reproduce bug for the specific (rare) file that fails:
import shutil
shutil.copyfile('src', 'dst')
error:
sent = os.sendfile(outfd, infd, offset, blocksize)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
OSError: [Errno 61] No data available: '/shared/fsx1/filename'
CPython versions tested on:
3.14
Operating systems tested on:
Linux
Linked PRs
- gh-139417
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start at shutil.copyfile's sendfile fast path and review how os.sendfile errors are handled. Reproduce the failure with shutil.copyfile('src', 'dst') on the affected filesystem; done means an ENODATA failure falls back to the standard read/write copy path.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- linux, python
- Domain
- operating-systems
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100