Support mixed sync and async context managers in `async with` statements
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Python
- Sterne
- 77.2k
- Forks
- 35.9k
- PR-Merge-Kennzahlen
- PR-Kennzahlen ausstehend
Beschreibung
Over the last few years, I've found myself writing a lot of code which leans heavily on context managers, and parenthesized context managers make it quite conventient to do so - in all but one case. If you have mixed synchronous and async context managers, each switch from sync to async costs another level of indentation, making the code noticably harder to read.
I therefore propose that the async with statement should also accept mixed sync and async context managers, so long as there is at least one async context manager.
I've been using a helper function which gets most of the way towards this. I nonetheless think that the feature would be valuable, because:
- It guides people away from a "convert to async cm" pattern (e.g.
as_acm(sync_cm()) as v,), which changes code semantics by adding checkpoints where the async framework can switch tasks - and entering or exiting context managers is an unusally bad time to do that, since they are often responsible for timeouts or error handling. - Keeping the
asclauses local helps to avoid naming confusion: when adding or deleting code, it's easy to mismatchasync with multicontext(some(), contexts()) as (a, b):relative toasync with some() as b, contexts as a:. As seen here, it's also more concise.
from contextlib import AsyncExitStack, asynccontextmanager
@asynccontextmanager
async def multicontext(*cms):
assert any(hasattr(cm, "__aenter__") for cm in cms)
async with AsyncExitStack() as stack:
enter, aenter = stack.enter_context, stack.enter_async_context
yield tuple(
(enter(cm) if hasattr(cm, "__enter__") else await aenter(cm))
for cm in cms
)
Has this already been discussed elsewhere?
This is a minor feature, which does not need previous discussion elsewhere.
Update: now on discuss.python.org to collect feedback.
Beitragsleitfaden
Erste Schritte
- Lies das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreib ins Issue, dass du es übernimmst — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forke das Repository und arbeite in einem Branch.
- Öffne einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Rechercherichtung
Im Issue werden keine Quelldateien oder Tests genannt. Lies zunächst den Vorschlag und den verlinkten discuss.python.org-Thread und ermittle dann die Sprachsemantik und den Implementierungsumfang, die erforderlich sind, um gemischte synchrone und asynchrone Kontextmanager zu ermöglichen. Abgeschlossen ist die Aufgabe, wenn Syntax und Verhalten vereinbart und durch geeignete Tests abgedeckt sind.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- python
- Bereich
- compilers
- Issue-Typ
- Feature
- Schwierigkeit
- 5/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- Über eine Woche
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Veraltet
- Klarheit
- Größtenteils klar
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 35/100