Simplify `_Py_uop_sym_is_const`
@tomasr8 ci sta già lavorando.
Dal 8/5/2025.
- Lingua principale
- Python
- Stelle
- 77.2k
- Fork
- 35.9k
- Metriche di merge delle PR
- Metriche PR in attesa
Descrizione
Feature or enhancement
Proposal:
_Py_uop_sym_is_const and _Py_uop_sym_get_const are almost identical. The only difference AFAICS is the return type:
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/1550c30fd5f2f2902bbcbf64165ae904ebcf7e81/Python/optimizer_symbols.c#L106-L122
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/1550c30fd5f2f2902bbcbf64165ae904ebcf7e81/Python/optimizer_symbols.c#L131-L148
We could simplify _Py_uop_sym_is_const by calling _Py_uop_sym_get_const and checking if the return is NULL:
diff --git a/Python/optimizer_symbols.c b/Python/optimizer_symbols.c
index e8a4f87031..1f58a3279e 100644
--- a/Python/optimizer_symbols.c
+++ b/Python/optimizer_symbols.c
@@ -106,19 +106,8 @@ _Py_uop_sym_is_not_null(JitOptSymbol *sym) {
bool
_Py_uop_sym_is_const(JitOptContext *ctx, JitOptSymbol *sym)
{
- if (sym->tag == JIT_SYM_KNOWN_VALUE_TAG) {
- return true;
- }
- if (sym->tag == JIT_SYM_TRUTHINESS_TAG) {
- JitOptSymbol *value = allocation_base(ctx) + sym->truthiness.value;
- int truthiness = _Py_uop_sym_truthiness(ctx, value);
- if (truthiness < 0) {
- return false;
- }
- make_const(sym, (truthiness ^ sym->truthiness.invert) ? Py_True : Py_False);
- return true;
- }
- return false;
+ PyObject *res = _Py_uop_sym_get_const(ctx, sym);
+ return res == NULL ? false : true;
}
bool
Has this already been discussed elsewhere?
This is a minor feature, which does not need previous discussion elsewhere
Links to previous discussion of this feature:
No response
Linked PRs
- gh-133884
Guida per i contributori
Apri la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Valutazione
Questa issue non è ancora stata valutata.