Simplify `_Py_uop_sym_is_const`
Abierto
@tomasr8 ya está trabajando en esto.
Desde el 8/5/2025.
interpreter-core
topic-JIT
type-feature
- Lenguaje dominante
- Python
- Estrellas
- 77.2k
- Forks
- 35.9k
- Métricas de merge de PR
- Métricas de PR pendientes
Descripción
Feature or enhancement
Proposal:
_Py_uop_sym_is_const and _Py_uop_sym_get_const are almost identical. The only difference AFAICS is the return type:
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/1550c30fd5f2f2902bbcbf64165ae904ebcf7e81/Python/optimizer_symbols.c#L106-L122
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/1550c30fd5f2f2902bbcbf64165ae904ebcf7e81/Python/optimizer_symbols.c#L131-L148
We could simplify _Py_uop_sym_is_const by calling _Py_uop_sym_get_const and checking if the return is NULL:
diff --git a/Python/optimizer_symbols.c b/Python/optimizer_symbols.c
index e8a4f87031..1f58a3279e 100644
--- a/Python/optimizer_symbols.c
+++ b/Python/optimizer_symbols.c
@@ -106,19 +106,8 @@ _Py_uop_sym_is_not_null(JitOptSymbol *sym) {
bool
_Py_uop_sym_is_const(JitOptContext *ctx, JitOptSymbol *sym)
{
- if (sym->tag == JIT_SYM_KNOWN_VALUE_TAG) {
- return true;
- }
- if (sym->tag == JIT_SYM_TRUTHINESS_TAG) {
- JitOptSymbol *value = allocation_base(ctx) + sym->truthiness.value;
- int truthiness = _Py_uop_sym_truthiness(ctx, value);
- if (truthiness < 0) {
- return false;
- }
- make_const(sym, (truthiness ^ sym->truthiness.invert) ? Py_True : Py_False);
- return true;
- }
- return false;
+ PyObject *res = _Py_uop_sym_get_const(ctx, sym);
+ return res == NULL ? false : true;
}
bool
Has this already been discussed elsewhere?
This is a minor feature, which does not need previous discussion elsewhere
Links to previous discussion of this feature:
No response
Linked PRs
- gh-133884
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Evaluación
Este issue todavía no se ha evaluado.