Use tagged ints for faster iteration

Iteration over tuples and short lists is quite inefficient as we need to create an iterator object, only to have to destroy it again moments later. Not only that, fetching values from iterators involves additional indirection compared to fetching them from sequences.

Instead we can push a pair of values to the stack. For common sequences, like tuple, list, strings, some ranges and a few others, we push the sequence and the integer index (initially 0) to the stack. For other iterables, we push the iterator and NULL.

GET_ITER will have the signature:
iterable -- iter, index_or_null
FOR_ITER now has the signature:
iter, index_or_null -- iter, index_or_null, next.

What makes this efficient is tagged integers. By using tagged integers, no objects need to be created.

Examples

GET_ITER

[ <tuple at ...> ] -> [ <tuple at ...>, 0 ]

[ <file at ...> ] -> [ <file iterator at ...>, NULL ]

FOR_ITER

[ <tuple at ...>, 0 ] -> [ <tuple at ...>, 1, item0 ]

[ <file iterator at ...>, NULL ] -> [ <file iterator at ...>, NULL, line ]

Linked PRs

• gh-132555
• gh-132592
• gh-135063
• gh-135137

Commencez par les PR liés gh-132555, gh-132592, gh-135063 et gh-135137 afin de déterminer l’état actuel de l’implémentation, puis suivez les signatures de pile de GET_ITER et FOR_ITER décrites ici. Le travail est considéré comme terminé lorsque les séquences courantes utilisent des indices entiers étiquetés sans objets itérateurs, tandis que les autres iterables conservent un itérateur et NULL.