python / python/cpython

Pass opaque state to PyContext_AddWatcher callback

Aperta
#127,124 3 commenti 0 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub

Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.

interpreter-core type-feature
Lingua principale
Python
Stelle
77.2k
Fork
35.9k
Metriche di merge delle PR
Metriche PR in attesa

Descrizione

Feature or enhancement

Proposal:

I would like to change the Context watcher C API (new to v3.14, see #119333) to pass an opaque pointer to the callback. Specifically, change:

https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/e8bb05394164e7735f7a9de80a046953606a38eb/Include/cpython/context.h#L39-L55

to:

/*
 * Context object watcher callback function.  arg is the same pointer passed to
 * PyContext_AddWatcher when the callback was registered.  The object passed to
 * the callback is event-specific; see PyContextEvent for details.
 *
 * if the callback returns with an exception set, it must return -1. Otherwise
 * it should return 0
 */
typedef int PyContext_WatchCallback(
    void *arg, PyContextEvent event, PyObject *obj);

/*
 * Register a per-interpreter callback that will be invoked for context events.
 * arg is an optional opaque pointer that is passed back to the callback; it
 * can be used to manage state if desired.
 *
 * Returns a handle that may be passed to PyContext_ClearWatcher on success,
 * or -1 and sets and error if no more handles are available.
 */
PyAPI_FUNC(int) PyContext_AddWatcher(
    PyContext_WatchCallback *callback, void *arg);

The original idea was for the callback to get any required state from the current context, but:

  • The config/state is not guaranteed to be available in the context. For example, the Python code can do ctx = contextvars.Context() instead of ctx = contextvars.copy_context(). Or it can do copy_context(), but early during initialization and squirrel the context away for later use. The latter seems plausible for 3rd party libraries (where the user might not have much control).
  • The same watcher callback cannot be registered multiple times simultaneously, each with its own config/state. This came up while I was refactoring TestContextObjectWatchers to add some more tests for a change I’m working on.

I’m not sure how likely either is to come up in normal use, but I think it is worth changing the design before the 3.14 release cements it.

Has this already been discussed elsewhere?

I have already discussed this feature proposal on Discourse

Links to previous discussion of this feature:

https://discuss.python.org/t/v3-14a1-design-limitations-of-pycontext-addwatcher/68177/4

cc @fried

Linked PRs
  • gh-127140
  • gh-127247

Guida per i contributori

Apri la guida per i contributori

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Direzione di ricerca

Inizia da Include/cpython/context.h, in corrispondenza delle dichiarazioni dei watcher di Context, e esamina Lib/test/test_capi/test_watchers.py, in particolare TestContextObjectWatchers. Controlla le PR collegati prima di iniziare, quindi verifica che l’opaque pointer registrato raggiunga il callback e che i test dei watcher coprano l’API aggiornata e passino.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Valutazione

Stack tecnologico
c, python
Ambito
api
Tipo di issue
Funzionalità
Difficoltà
4/5
Tempo stimato
3-5 giorni
Stato di attività
Ferma
Chiarezza
Specificata chiaramente
Idoneità per principianti
30/100

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.