Exception that calls `super().__init__` breaks `copy.copy`
還沒有人認領這個 Issue。
- 主要語言
- Python
- 星號
- 77.2k
- 分支
- 36k
- PR 合併指標
- PR 指標待擷取
描述
Bug report
Bug description:
For some reason calling Exception.__init__ breaks copy.copys ability to detect args. The following code
import copy
class MyException(Exception):
def __init__(self, x):
super().__init__()
self.x = x
my_exc = MyException(5)
copy.copy(my_exc)
gives
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./foo.py", line 9, in <module>
copy.copy(my_exc)
File "/usr/lib/python3.12/copy.py", line 97, in copy
return _reconstruct(x, None, *rv)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.12/copy.py", line 253, in _reconstruct
y = func(*args)
^^^^^^^^^^^
TypeError: MyException.__init__() missing 1 required positional argument: 'x'
Removing the super().__init__() line makes everything work as expected, but given that it's generally seen as good practice to call super().__init__() in child classes, and you may be working with a more complex class structure, this seems like pretty bad behavior.
I haven't dug deep enough into copy.copy or BaseException.__init__ to decide which one deserves the blame.
For the reason why I want to copy exceptions, see https://github.com/python-trio/flake8-async/issues/298
CPython versions tested on:
3.9, 3.10, 3.11, 3.12, 3.13, 3.14
Operating systems tested on:
Linux
貢獻指南
從這裡開始
- 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
- Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
- 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。
研究方向
使用 copy.copy 重現該範例,並結合 BaseException.init 檢查 /usr/lib/python3.12/copy.py 中的行為。確定初始化器呼叫 super().init() 的 Exception 的預期複製行為,然後新增一個回歸測試,表明複製能夠保留所需的建構函式狀態且不會引發 TypeError。
由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。
評估
- 技術堆疊
- python
- 領域
- backend
- Issue 類型
- 缺陷
- 難度
- 4/5
- 預估耗時
- 3-5 天
- 活躍度
- 停滯
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 35/100