`datetime.strptime` accepts incompatible arguments
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 77.2k
- 派生
- 35.9k
- PR 合并指标
- PR 指标待抓取
描述
Bug report
Bug description:
If you over-specify a datetime strptime string, it seems that datetime.strptime when encountering a component that has been specified twice, will overwrite earlier values with more recent ones.
>>> datetime.strptime("200099", "%Y%y")
datetime.datetime(1999, 1, 1, 0, 0)
One approach would be to ban over-specified formats, but that would be a problem for someone who wants to, use a format like "%M %B" (e.g. something sortable by month number while also showing month name), so I think we don't want to do that.
Alternatively we could start raising an exception if you get different values from these two things, or possibly a warning.
Or we can just accept that if you use a weird format you should expect weird behavior.
CPython versions tested on:
CPython main branch
Operating systems tested on:
Linux
Linked PRs
- gh-125009
- gh-132524
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
调研方向
从 datetime.strptime 的实现开始,检查相关 PR gh-125009 和 gh-132524,以了解当前方向和相关测试。确定相互冲突的重复字段应当引发错误、发出警告,还是继续接受;当行为和测试反映出已决定的策略时,即视为完成。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- python
- 领域
- backend
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 难度
- 5/5
- 预计耗时
- 一周以上
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 描述清晰度
- 需要澄清
- 新手友好度
- 25/100