Expand documentation for importlib.metadata custom providers to include caveats regarding backports
@jaraco 已經在處理了。
開始於 2024年9月11日。
- 主要語言
- Python
- 星號
- 77.2k
- 分支
- 35.9k
- PR 合併指標
- PR 指標待擷取
描述
Documentation
As importlib_metadata provides a backport of importlib.metadata and asserts primacy when imported, for consumers of the API, it provides a consistent interface, except when a custom provider serves objects as imported from importlib.metadata (not using the backport). For example:
- project A implements and installs a DistributionFinder to
sys.meta_pathprovidingimportlib.metadata.Distributioninstances. - project B calls
importlib_metadata.distributions()to return all distributions, including that of project A. - A user installs project A and project B.
- When project B queries for the distributions, expecting it to return
Iterable[importlib_metadata.Distribution]objects, their expectation is violated when theDistributionFinderinstalled by project A emitsimportlib.metadata.Distributionobjects.
python/importlib_metadata#486 captures this concern. python/importlib_metadata#505 promises to correct this concern by wrapping and transforming any objects from custom providers referencing importlib.metadata to instead use objects from importlib_metadata.
However, for importlib.metadata.Distribution objects, it's not possible to replace safely the objects of an arbitrary custom provider, so the proposed implementation emits a warning when such an object is encountered.
Therefore, we'd like to add some documentation to the custom provider docs to advise custom providers on what to do to avoid their users encountering the warning. In particular:
- Custom providers should emit
importlib_metadata.Distributionobjects whenimportlib_metadatais present, or- Custom providers should register their objects with
importlib_metadatato bypass the warning.
Linked PRs
- gh-123977
貢獻指南
從這裡開始
- 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
- Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
- 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。
評估
這個 Issue 還沒有評估資料。