Expand documentation for importlib.metadata custom providers to include caveats regarding backports
@jaraco 已经在做这个了。
开始于 2024年9月11日。
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 77.2k
- 派生
- 35.9k
- PR 合并指标
- PR 指标待抓取
描述
Documentation
As importlib_metadata provides a backport of importlib.metadata and asserts primacy when imported, for consumers of the API, it provides a consistent interface, except when a custom provider serves objects as imported from importlib.metadata (not using the backport). For example:
- project A implements and installs a DistributionFinder to
sys.meta_pathprovidingimportlib.metadata.Distributioninstances. - project B calls
importlib_metadata.distributions()to return all distributions, including that of project A. - A user installs project A and project B.
- When project B queries for the distributions, expecting it to return
Iterable[importlib_metadata.Distribution]objects, their expectation is violated when theDistributionFinderinstalled by project A emitsimportlib.metadata.Distributionobjects.
python/importlib_metadata#486 captures this concern. python/importlib_metadata#505 promises to correct this concern by wrapping and transforming any objects from custom providers referencing importlib.metadata to instead use objects from importlib_metadata.
However, for importlib.metadata.Distribution objects, it's not possible to replace safely the objects of an arbitrary custom provider, so the proposed implementation emits a warning when such an object is encountered.
Therefore, we'd like to add some documentation to the custom provider docs to advise custom providers on what to do to avoid their users encountering the warning. In particular:
- Custom providers should emit
importlib_metadata.Distributionobjects whenimportlib_metadatais present, or- Custom providers should register their objects with
importlib_metadatato bypass the warning.
Linked PRs
- gh-123977
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
评估
这个 Issue 还没有评估数据。