The use of `PyStackRef_AsPyObjectBorrow` makes it hard to track ownership of references, making analysis of escaping calls too difficult

The problem with PyStackRef_AsPyObjectBorrow is that it is not clear whether the reference is owned by the stack ref or the pointer.

Borrowing references across calls is fine but in less structured code, it is error prone and very hard to analyze.

The solution is change most, ideally all, uses of PyStackRef_AsPyObjectBorrow to PyStackRef_AsPyObjectSteal so that the ownership of the reference is clear.
E.g.

        inst(UNARY_NEGATIVE, (value -- res)) {
            PyObject *val_o = PyStackRef_AsPyObjectBorrow(value);
            PyObject *res_o = PyNumber_Negative(val_o);
            PyStackRef_CLOSE(value);
            ERROR_IF(res_o == NULL, error);
            res = PyStackRef_FromPyObjectSteal(res_o);
        }

would become:

        inst(UNARY_NEGATIVE, (value -- res)) {
            PyObject *val_o = PyStackRef_AsPyObjectSteal(value);
            PyObject *res_o = PyNumber_Negative(val_o);
            Py_DECREF(val_o);
            ERROR_IF(res_o == NULL, error);
            res = PyStackRef_FromPyObjectSteal(res_o);
        }

This ensures that during the escaping call to PyNumber_Negative, the reference to the value a PyObject *, so will not be reclaimed by the garbage collector.

Linked PRs

• gh-122037

在 CPython 原始碼中搜尋 PyStackRef_AsPyObjectBorrow 的使用位置，並檢視 issue 中展示的 PyStackRef_AsPyObjectSteal 和 PyStackRef_CLOSE 擁有權模式。判定哪些使用位置跨越了可能導致參照逸出的呼叫，然後確認相關參照仍然有效且擁有權是明確的；將這項工作與連結的 PR gh-122037 進行比較。