CPU utilisation drop when increasing number of threads with `threading`
還沒有人認領這個 Issue。
- 主要語言
- Python
- 星號
- 77.2k
- 分支
- 35.9k
- PR 合併指標
- PR 指標待擷取
描述
Bug report
Bug description:
Hi :)
This issue is essentially a re-open of https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/118153, but with some more experiments added.
I'm testing the free-threaded Python build. I'm running a simple test (code below), which triggers a computationally heavy function across CPU cores using threading module. Time measurements of the script are the following:
num_threads = 2 -> 0.68 s
num_threads = 8 -> 5.48 s
num_threads = 18 -> 12.1 s
In ideal world, I believe I could expect the three numbers above to be the same (or comparable). I've also gathered the profiles of the experiment:
num_threads = 2
num_threads = 8
num_threads = 18 (showing only some threads, but the picture illustrates the issue)
As we can see, the CPU utilisation decreases with the number of CPU threads used (almost 99% for nt=2, about 75% for nt=8 and ~40% for nt=18). We also see increased CPU core switching frequency. My guess is that the reason of decreased CPU utilisation is the overhead on the threading module.
Running some further experiments, I've run the program on a high number of threads (thus according to previous observation, the CPU utilisation should be low), but with both busy and idle wait on 10 threads and actual sin*cos computation on 2 threads. In both of these scenarios, we observe high CPU utilisation on worker threads:
idle wait (implemented with time.sleep)
busy wait (implemented with while loop)
Interestingly, zooming-in to be CPU utilisation profile (the "slow" case) we do see that there are parts in the timeline, where CPU is saturated and all threads are working in parallel. However, there are also periods, where CPU utilisation is scattered:
Lastly, as a sanity check, the same operation implemented in C++:
May this be a bug inside threading module? I've went through PEP 703, but I've seen no mention about this part. If the overhead on threading is the root cause of lowered utilisation, may this issue be addressed?
@colesbury , tagging you here since I believe you'd know most about the free-threaded Python build. Should this issue be added to the list in https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/108219?
Testing configuration:
Ubuntu 22.04
Python 3.13 ToT
scaling_governor - performance
CPU(s): 36
On-line CPU(s) list: 0-35
Vendor ID: GenuineIntel
Model name: Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-10980XE CPU @ 3.00GHz
CPython build command:
./configure --disable-gil --enable-optimizations && make -j && make install
Testing script:
import math
import time
import nvtx
import threading
def computational_heavy(iterations):
val = 0
for i in range(1, iterations):
val += math.sin(i) * math.cos(i)
return val
def test(thread_id, iterations=1000000):
with nvtx.annotate("Calculation"):
computational_heavy(iterations)
num_threads = 18
threads = [
threading.Thread(target=test, name=f"Thread{i}", args=(i,))
for i in range(num_threads)
]
start = time.perf_counter_ns()
for t in threads:
t.start()
for t in threads:
t.join()
stop = time.perf_counter_ns()
print(f"Elapsed time {stop-start} ns")
CPython versions tested on:
CPython main branch
Operating systems tested on:
Linux
貢獻指南
從這裡開始
- 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
- Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
- 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。
研究方向
首先,在指定的 Linux 設定上使用提供的 threading 測試腳本,重現回報的 free-threaded CPython 行為。比較執行緒數量變化時的 profiler 結果,然後檢查測量結果所涉及的 threading 和 free-threaded 執行階段路徑。完成的標準是找出使用率降低的原因,並確定經過驗證的修正方向。
由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。
評估
- 技術堆疊
- python
- 領域
- operating-systems, performance
- Issue 類型
- 缺陷
- 難度
- 5/5
- 預估耗時
- 一週以上
- 活躍度
- 停滯
- 描述清晰度
- 需要釐清
- 新手友好度
- 25/100