CPU utilisation drop when increasing number of threads with `threading`
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 77.2k
- 派生
- 36k
- PR 合并指标
- PR 指标待抓取
描述
Bug report
Bug description:
Hi :)
This issue is essentially a re-open of https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/118153, but with some more experiments added.
I'm testing the free-threaded Python build. I'm running a simple test (code below), which triggers a computationally heavy function across CPU cores using threading module. Time measurements of the script are the following:
num_threads = 2 -> 0.68 s
num_threads = 8 -> 5.48 s
num_threads = 18 -> 12.1 s
In ideal world, I believe I could expect the three numbers above to be the same (or comparable). I've also gathered the profiles of the experiment:
num_threads = 2
num_threads = 8
num_threads = 18 (showing only some threads, but the picture illustrates the issue)
As we can see, the CPU utilisation decreases with the number of CPU threads used (almost 99% for nt=2, about 75% for nt=8 and ~40% for nt=18). We also see increased CPU core switching frequency. My guess is that the reason of decreased CPU utilisation is the overhead on the threading module.
Running some further experiments, I've run the program on a high number of threads (thus according to previous observation, the CPU utilisation should be low), but with both busy and idle wait on 10 threads and actual sin*cos computation on 2 threads. In both of these scenarios, we observe high CPU utilisation on worker threads:
idle wait (implemented with time.sleep)
busy wait (implemented with while loop)
Interestingly, zooming-in to be CPU utilisation profile (the "slow" case) we do see that there are parts in the timeline, where CPU is saturated and all threads are working in parallel. However, there are also periods, where CPU utilisation is scattered:
Lastly, as a sanity check, the same operation implemented in C++:
May this be a bug inside threading module? I've went through PEP 703, but I've seen no mention about this part. If the overhead on threading is the root cause of lowered utilisation, may this issue be addressed?
@colesbury , tagging you here since I believe you'd know most about the free-threaded Python build. Should this issue be added to the list in https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/108219?
Testing configuration:
Ubuntu 22.04
Python 3.13 ToT
scaling_governor - performance
CPU(s): 36
On-line CPU(s) list: 0-35
Vendor ID: GenuineIntel
Model name: Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-10980XE CPU @ 3.00GHz
CPython build command:
./configure --disable-gil --enable-optimizations && make -j && make install
Testing script:
import math
import time
import nvtx
import threading
def computational_heavy(iterations):
val = 0
for i in range(1, iterations):
val += math.sin(i) * math.cos(i)
return val
def test(thread_id, iterations=1000000):
with nvtx.annotate("Calculation"):
computational_heavy(iterations)
num_threads = 18
threads = [
threading.Thread(target=test, name=f"Thread{i}", args=(i,))
for i in range(num_threads)
]
start = time.perf_counter_ns()
for t in threads:
t.start()
for t in threads:
t.join()
stop = time.perf_counter_ns()
print(f"Elapsed time {stop-start} ns")
CPython versions tested on:
CPython main branch
Operating systems tested on:
Linux
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
调研方向
首先,在指定的 Linux 配置上使用提供的 threading 测试脚本,复现报告的 free-threaded CPython 行为。比较线程数变化时的 profiler 结果,然后检查测量结果所涉及的 threading 和 free-threaded 运行时路径。完成的标准是找出利用率降低的原因,并确定经过验证的修正方向。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- python
- 领域
- operating-systems, performance
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 难度
- 5/5
- 预计耗时
- 一周以上
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 描述清晰度
- 需要澄清
- 新手友好度
- 25/100