Worker management race conditions in `ThreadPoolExecutor` and `ProcessPoolExecutor`

We have tests that ThreadPoolExecutor and ProcessPoolExecutor reuse workers. The test wait for the previous task to complete before submitting the next task.

https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/29829b58a8328a7c2ccacaa74c1d7d120a5e5ca5/Lib/test/test_concurrent_futures/test_thread_pool.py#L44-L50

The problem is that the tasks are potentially completed before the thread or process is marked as idle. Calling Future.result() doesn't guarantee that there is an idle worker. This happens much more frequently with the GIL disabled, but it can happen with the GIL enabled too if you have an unlucky GIL switch.

https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/29829b58a8328a7c2ccacaa74c1d7d120a5e5ca5/Lib/concurrent/futures/thread.py#L81-L95

For example, you can reliably trigger the problem with the GIL enabled by adding a short time.sleep(0.01) immediately after the work_item.run() call in:
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/29829b58a8328a7c2ccacaa74c1d7d120a5e5ca5/Lib/concurrent/futures/thread.py#L92

It's not clear to me if this is just a problem with the unit tests or an actual bug with the executor implementation.

Linked PRs

• gh-117355

從 Lib/test/test_concurrent_futures/test_thread_pool.py 中引用的重用測試以及 Lib/concurrent/futures/thread.py 中的 worker 生命週期程式碼開始；同時檢查對應的 ProcessPoolExecutor 路徑。確定這個競爭條件是否需要更強的測試同步，還是需要修改 executor，然後執行 concurrent-futures 測試套件，並確保 worker 重用在啟用 GIL 和停用 GIL 的執行過程中都可靠。