Worker management race conditions in `ThreadPoolExecutor` and `ProcessPoolExecutor`

We have tests that ThreadPoolExecutor and ProcessPoolExecutor reuse workers. The test wait for the previous task to complete before submitting the next task.

https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/29829b58a8328a7c2ccacaa74c1d7d120a5e5ca5/Lib/test/test_concurrent_futures/test_thread_pool.py#L44-L50

The problem is that the tasks are potentially completed before the thread or process is marked as idle. Calling Future.result() doesn't guarantee that there is an idle worker. This happens much more frequently with the GIL disabled, but it can happen with the GIL enabled too if you have an unlucky GIL switch.

https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/29829b58a8328a7c2ccacaa74c1d7d120a5e5ca5/Lib/concurrent/futures/thread.py#L81-L95

For example, you can reliably trigger the problem with the GIL enabled by adding a short time.sleep(0.01) immediately after the work_item.run() call in:
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/29829b58a8328a7c2ccacaa74c1d7d120a5e5ca5/Lib/concurrent/futures/thread.py#L92

It's not clear to me if this is just a problem with the unit tests or an actual bug with the executor implementation.

Linked PRs

• gh-117355

从 Lib/test/test_concurrent_futures/test_thread_pool.py 中引用的复用测试以及 Lib/concurrent/futures/thread.py 中的 worker 生命周期代码开始；同时检查对应的 ProcessPoolExecutor 路径。确定该竞争条件是否需要更强的测试同步，还是需要修改 executor，然后运行 concurrent-futures 测试套件，并确保 worker 复用在启用 GIL 和禁用 GIL 的执行过程中都可靠。