`"import"` audit hook documentation is misleading
Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.
- Langage dominant
- Python
- Étoiles
- 77.2k
- Forks
- 35.9k
- Métriques de merge des PR
- Métriques de PR en attente
Description
Documentation
The documentation for the import statement states that it:
Raises an auditing event import with arguments module, filename, sys.path, sys.meta_path, sys.path_hooks.
However, this is not the case if the target of the import is already in sys.modules, as the audit event is raised only on first import. For imports of Python source, the event fires from import_find_and_load(), which is called from PyImport_ImportModuleLevelObject() only if the module is not already loaded.
The docs seem to suggest that the audit event is associated with the statement, but the docs are wrong.
Promote to bug?
I'm filing this as a documentation issue because the docs are not describing this behavior, but it seems that it may represent a bug in CPython. I'm willing to write a patch either way and would like a core developer to decide if this is a docs problem or a runtime problem.
It seems to me that there are a lot of use cases where a user really does want an audit event for every import statement, regardless of whether or not the module has already been imported. In fact, I found this quirk specifically because of one of these use cases. I had an application running import torch in a place where that (memory-hungry) import needed to be deferred, but the output of my debugging audit hook showed me only the first import (which luckily was still enough information to fix the problem).
If a core developer agrees that it makes sense to raise this event even if the target module is already present in sys.modules, this could be promoted to a CPython bug.
Sample program
# target_program.py
import sys
import hook
sys.addaudithook(hook.audit_numpy_import)
# BEGIN unmodified target program
import numpy
from helper import somefunc # also runs `import numpy`
def random_array():
arr = np.random.randint(0, 255, size=(30, 50))
return arr, somefunc()
helper.py
import numpy
def somefunc():
return numpy.array([42])
hook.py
import inspect
import sys
def audit_numpy_import(event, args):
if event != "import":
return
TARGET_MODULE = "numpy"
module, filename, syspath, sysmeta_path, syspath_hooks = args
if module == TARGET_MODULE:
stack = inspect.stack()
target_frame = stack[1] # index 0 is *this* frame, index 1 is where the audit event happened
fn = target_frame.filename
lineno = target_frame.lineno
print(f"{TARGET_MODULE} imported at {fn}:{lineno}")
Running the above instrument program produces the output:
$ python3 target_program.py
numpy imported at /tmp/whats-importing-that-module/target_program.py:8
Where the output I wanted is:
numpy imported at /tmp/whats-importing-that-module/target_program.py:8
numpy imported at /tmp/whats-importing-that-module/helper.py:1
I've confirmed that I can get the above output if I add sys.modules.pop("numpy") after the first numpy import, but unfortunately this (unreliable!) workaround cannot be used from the audit hook, since the module is not placed there until after the hook has finished executing.
Guide de contribution
Ouvrir le guide de contribution
Par où commencer
- Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
- Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
- Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
- Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.
Piste de recherche
Commencez par la documentation de l’instruction d’importation dans Doc/reference/simple_stmts.rst et comparez sa formulation de l’événement d’audit avec le comportement décrit dans Python/import.c, en particulier import_find_and_load() et PyImport_ImportModuleLevelObject(). Exécutez le programme d’exemple pour reproduire l’écart. Le travail est terminé lorsque le projet a déterminé s’il s’agit d’un problème de documentation ou d’exécution, et que le comportement concerné est correctement couvert.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Évaluation
- Stack technique
- python
- Domaine
- documentation
- Type d'issue
- Documentation
- Difficulté
- 4/5
- Temps estimé
- 3-5 jours
- Activité
- À l'abandon
- Clarté
- Plutôt claire
- Accessibilité débutants
- 35/100