pytest-dev / pytest-dev/execnet
Unhandled error in sys.excepthook
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 102
- 派生
- 47
- PR 合并指标
- 30 天内没有已合并 PR
描述
- Bitbucket: https://bitbucket.org/hpk42/execnet/issue/30
- Originally reported by: @alfredodeza
- Originally created at: 2014-02-10T16:05:34.775
After closing the connections we are seeing a few thread errors that seem impossible to get rid of. At the point where they are sent to stderr there is nothing left running and the code has closed the gateway.
Unhandled exception in thread started by
Error in sys.excepthook:
Original exception was:
Running execnet with debug show this:
[53488] gw0 [receiver-thread] RECEIVERTHREAD: starting to run
[53488] gw0 sent <Message.CHANNEL_EXEC channelid=1 len=6354>
[53488] gw0 sent <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 'platform_information()'>
[53488] gw0 [receiver-thread] received <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 ('Ubuntu', '12.04', 'precise')>
[53488] gw0 sent <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 'machine_type()'>
[53488] gw0 [receiver-thread] received <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 'x86_64'>
[53488] gw0 sent <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 'shortname()'>
[53488] gw0 [receiver-thread] received <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 'node1'>
[53488] gw0 sent <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 len=324>
[53488] gw0 [receiver-thread] received <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 None>
[53488] gw0 sent <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 len=127>
[53488] gw0 [receiver-thread] received <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 None>
[53488] gw0 gateway.exit() called
[53488] gw0 --> sending GATEWAY_TERMINATE
[53488] gw0 --> io.close_write
[53488] gw0 [receiver-thread] EOF without prior gateway termination message
[53488] gw0 [receiver-thread] entering finalization
[53488] gw0 finished receiving
[53488] gw0 [receiver-thread] terminating execution
[53488] gw0 [receiver-thread] closing read
[53488] gw0 [receiver-thread] closing write
[53488] gw0 [receiver-thread] leaving finalization
[53488] gw1 [receiver-thread] RECEIVERTHREAD: starting to run
[53488] gw1 sent <Message.CHANNEL_EXEC channelid=1 len=6354>
[53488] gw1 sent <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 'platform_information()'>
[53488] gw1 [receiver-thread] received <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 ('CentOS', '6.4', 'Final')>
[53488] gw1 sent <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 'machine_type()'>
[53488] gw1 [receiver-thread] received <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 'x86_64'>
[53488] gw1 sent <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 'shortname()'>
[53488] gw1 [receiver-thread] received <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 'node2'>
[53488] gw1 sent <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 len=324>
[53488] gw1 [receiver-thread] received <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 None>
[53488] gw1 sent <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 len=127>
[53488] gw1 [receiver-thread] received <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 None>
[53488] gw1 gateway.exit() called
[53488] gw1 --> sending GATEWAY_TERMINATE
[53488] gw1 --> io.close_write
[53488] === atexit cleanup <Group []> ===
[53488] gw0 1 channel.__del__
[53488] gw1 1 channel.__del__
Unhandled exception in thread started by
Error in sys.excepthook:
Original exception was:
It looks as though this is happening in the threading module in Python itself. I am not sure something is possible to eat up these messages.
There is a ticket open in the Python bug tracker that mentions this problem is closed:
http://bugs.python.org/issue1722344
One of the patches that one commenter added looks like what we would need to get rid of them (http://bugs.python.org/file9356/1722344_squelch_exception.patch)
--- /usr/lib/python2.5/threading.py.orig 2008-02-04 13:58:18.000000000 -0600
+++ ./threading.py 2008-02-05 11:55:33.000000000 -0600
@@ -472,34 +472,18 @@
_sys.stderr.write("Exception in thread %s:\n%s\n" %
(self.getName(), _format_exc()))
else:
- # Do the best job possible w/o a huge amt. of code to
- # approximate a traceback (code ideas from
- # Lib/traceback.py)
- exc_type, exc_value, exc_tb = self.__exc_info()
- try:
- print>>self.__stderr, (
- "Exception in thread " + self.getName() +
- " (most likely raised during interpreter shutdown):")
- print>>self.__stderr, (
- "Traceback (most recent call last):")
- while exc_tb:
- print>>self.__stderr, (
- ' File "%s", line %s, in %s' %
- (exc_tb.tb_frame.f_code.co_filename,
- exc_tb.tb_lineno,
- exc_tb.tb_frame.f_code.co_name))
- exc_tb = exc_tb.tb_next
- print>>self.__stderr, ("%s: %s" % (exc_type, exc_value))
- # Make sure that exc_tb gets deleted since it is a memory
- # hog; deleting everything else is just for thoroughness
- finally:
- del exc_type, exc_value, exc_tb
+ # If _sys is missing, then the interpreter is shutting
+ # down and the thread should no longer exist. If this
+ # happens, ignore the error and exit gracefully.
+ pass
else:
if __debug__:
self._note("%s.__bootstrap(): normal return", self)
finally:
- self.__stop()
+ # Exceptions will also be raised during stop/delete if the
+ # interpreter is shutting down. Ignore these as well.
try:
+ self.__stop()
self.__delete()
except:
pass
贡献指南
这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
调研方向
首先使用 execnet 调试输出复现关闭序列,重点关注 gateway.exit()、receiver-thread 的最终处理,以及报告中所示的 atexit 清理。将产生的错误与 Python 的 threading 关闭行为和链接的 threading.py 补丁进行比较。当解释器关闭时的清理不再输出未处理线程和 sys.excepthook 错误时,即表示完成。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- python
- 领域
- distributed-systems
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 35/100