Investigate using postgresql ArrayField rather than JSONField for simple, one-dimensional lists of strings
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 49
- 派生
- 88
- 平均合并
- 1 天 10 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 31
描述
We've got a ton of these: https://github.com/pulp/pulp_python/blob/master/pulp_python/app/models.py#L113-L117
It would be interesting whether ArrayField is more efficient or convenient for this use case. https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/ref/contrib/postgres/fields/#arrayfield
We should do some research to see if it's a good idea - other plugins may want to adopt it also.
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
调研方向
Start with pulp_python/app/models.py lines 113-117 and the Django ArrayField documentation. Compare ArrayField with JSONField for the simple one-dimensional string lists described there, including efficiency and convenience. Done means producing a clear recommendation about whether this approach is suitable for adoption by other plugins.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- django, postgresql, python
- 领域
- databases
- Issue 类型
- 功能
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 35/100