psake / psake/PowerShellBuild

CI: Install the built module from a local repository to verify install-time dependency behaviour

オープン
#229 コメント 0 件 リアクション 0 件 担当者 0 名 GitHub で見る

まだ誰も着手していません。

enhancement github_actions
主要言語
PowerShell
スター
145
フォーク
27
平均マージ
10時間 16分
マージ済み PR(30日)
34

説明

CI builds this module on every push and has never once installed it. The v1.0.0 roadmap (#120) records why that matters: several breaks this cycle are install-time — RequiredModules now demands psake 5.0.4 and Pester 6.0.0, and PlatyPS was removed from it — and none of them can be observed from a build. Until now the plan covered that gap with a 1.0.0-rc1 gallery prerelease and a seven-day soak. That prerelease has been dropped (decision recorded on #120, 2026-09-04), and this test is the safeguard that replaces it.

What the test does

Publish the built module into a temporary file-share repository alongside mirrored copies of its three dependencies, then in a fresh process whose PSModulePath holds only an empty directory, Save-Module it from that repository and import the result. That exercises, without touching the PowerShell Gallery or the machine's module store:

  • every RequiredModules entry is declared correctly and resolves
  • the generated nuspec's <dependencies> match the manifest — verified today to be exactly BuildHelpers 2.0.16, Pester 6.0.0, psake 5.0.4, with no PlatyPS
  • the saved module imports its required modules from the isolated path and exports its commands
  • on both PowerShell 7 and Windows PowerShell 5.1

Prototyped and measured, 2026-09-04

Both editions: Save-Module succeeded, all three dependencies resolved at the declared versions, the module imported and exported 12 functions plus the PowerShellBuild.IB.Tasks alias. The negative control — manifest edited to require psake 99.0.0 — failed on both editions with ProviderFailToDownloadFile and nothing on disk, so the test can fail.

Two traps the prototype hit that the implementation must avoid:

  1. Save-Module restores the default PSModulePath when it returns. The first attempt imported the machine's installed 0.8.2 and loaded Pester 6.1.0 instead of the saved 6.0.0. Re-assert the isolated path after Save-Module and import by explicit manifest path.
  2. Everything is already installed on a developer machine. Without the empty-PSModulePath isolation the test is vacuous.

On Windows PowerShell 5.1, stage PowerShellGet 2.2.5 from the WindowsPowerShell module path; the PowerShell 7 copy's PackageManagement ships coreclr binaries only and fails to load there.

The re-runnable prototype, including the negative control, is at scratchpad/local-repo-test/Invoke-LocalRepoProbe.ps1 on the maintainer's machine and should be the starting point.

What it does not cover, deliberately

A local repository is a snapshot: it does not resolve against the live dependency graph (newest-satisfying Pester 6.x rather than the 6.0.0 floor), transitive dependency drift, gallery ingestion, or real network transport on 5.1. Also note that with PowerShellGet 2.x a file-share repository gets prerelease gating wrongFind-Module without -AllowPrerelease returns a prerelease — so this test must not be used to verify prerelease behaviour; PSResourceGet against the same folder gates correctly.

One thing worth recording because it changed the release decision: Publish-Module itself refuses to publish a package whose RequiredModules cannot be resolved on the destination repository (UnableToResolveModuleDependency), and the same code path runs against PSGallery. A 1.0.0 with an unsatisfiable dependency fails at publish rather than reaching consumers.

Options

  1. A repository-local workflow that runs on every push, alongside the shared ModuleCI.yml call. Simplest; covers this repository only.
  2. Add it to the shared psake/.github workflow as an opt-in step. More work; benefits psake too.
  3. Run it as a documented pre-flight step on #160 only. Cheapest, but the coverage is lost the day after the release.

Option 1 is the straightforward first step and can be promoted to 2 later.

Done when

The test runs in CI on both editions, passes against main, and has been shown to fail against a manifest with an unsatisfiable dependency.

コントリビューションガイド

コントリビューションガイドを開く

はじめの一歩

  1. issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
  2. 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
  3. リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
  4. issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。

調査の方向性

scratchpad/local-repo-test/Invoke-LocalRepoProbe.ps1 から始め、続いてリポジトリローカルのワークフローを、共有されている ModuleCI.yml の呼び出しと併せて調査します。PowerShell 7 と Windows PowerShell 5.1 で、依存関係のバージョンとネガティブコントロールを含む、分離された Save-Module およびインポートの動作を検証します。完了とは、両方のエディションで CI が実行されて成功し、満たせない依存関係に対して失敗することです。

索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。

評価

技術スタック
powershell
領域
ci-cd, testing-qa
issue の種類
機能追加
難易度
4/5
見積もり時間
3〜5日
活発さ
活発
明瞭さ
明確に書かれている
初心者へのやさしさ
68/100

新しい issue をメールで受け取る

初心者向けの GitHub issue を短くまとめたダイジェスト。