posit-dev / posit-dev/rsconnect-python
Consider supporting additional dependency formats
まだ誰も着手していません。
- 主要言語
- Python
- スター
- 37
- フォーク
- 28
- 平均マージ
- 1日 3時間
- マージ済み PR(30日)
- 7
説明
We use bot RSConnect and pypoetry quite a bit. It would be great if rsconnect-python supported deploying pypoetry projects or other ways of plugging in to pyproject.toml buiold systems.
We currently work around this limitation by wrapping rsconnect with our own tool that first runs poetry export (without extra repo urls) and copies our apps (stored using an src project layout) to a deploy directory containing the AppStore json file. We use the fact that rsconnect.environment stops after finding a requirements.txt.
There's multiple aspects of this request:
Implementation options
1.1 Possibly consider supporting poetry directly
1.2 There are other competing approaches to python dependencies e.g. PEP 631 allows dependencies in the pyproject.toml and other package management tools like Hatch use that. Allow cli callers to specify a cli tool to be called for resolving project dependencies
1.3 like 1.2 but only expose it via an api (i.e. pluggable build / dependency systems would only be supported by writing a custom tool that has rsconnect-python as a dependency and invokes it programatically.
Streamline non-pypi package registries
When running poetry export on a project that's setup to use non pypi repositories, extra pip urls are included at the top of the generated requirements.txt. When the repo is private and password protected
- rsconnect-python fails to properly parse the requirements
- the username and password are included in the file, which is insecure given how connect deploys content.
We currently work around this by stripping any extra pip url lines and manually configuring the connect serve's pipconf with the required private package registry details.
Support other project layouts
We organize all our project sources under a src folder. Poetry already knows about our python path and where our sources, tests and resources live. One possible approach would be to allow deploying an app by copying dist tarball since poetry build can easily produce that (the poetry.lock / poetry export should still be used to resolve dependencies though).
コントリビューションガイド
はじめの一歩
- issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
- 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
- リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
- issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。
調査の方向性
まず、issue に記載されている rsconnect.environment による requirements.txt の処理から始め、次に poetry export ワークフローとプライベートレジストリのケースを再現します。要求されている pyproject.toml の依存関係解決、src レイアウト、および dist tarball のデプロイオプションを比較します。完了には、選択した依存関係とプロジェクトレイアウトの動作を対象とする、スコープと実装方針の決定が必要です。
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
評価
- 技術スタック
- python
- 領域
- build-system, cli
- issue の種類
- 機能追加
- 難易度
- 5/5
- 見積もり時間
- 1週間以上
- 活発さ
- 停滞
- 明瞭さ
- 説明が足りない
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 25/100