plotly / plotly/plotly.py

graph_objs.volume and .isosurface not rendering non-cuboid

Open
#3,933 6 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

bug P3
Dominant language
Python
Stars
18.8k
Forks
2.8k
Avg merge
16h 26m
Merged PRs (30d)
21

Description

I'm trying to use plotly in a dash app to render a cuboid, that's sheared to the y-axis.=it has a parallelogram as ground surface. It consists of individual points, each with a density value. plotly_express.scatter_3d renders the individual points correctly, but only has "2 views" when rotating it:

  • One where the closest face is rendered
  • -> you can't look inside very well
  • One where both the closest face and the inside of the structure are not rendered
  • -> you can only see the 2 rear side faces, but from the inside

With both, I'm losing a lot of information on the insides of my structure.
I think scatter_3d doesn't allow for

  • a) all points to stay rendered at all times
  • b) me to link each individual points opacity to its density value (like it does with color)¹

Best looking solution would be graph_objs.Volume or .isosurface, but they have an issue.

So far, the coordinates data had to be arranged to form an orthogonal cuboid, to render a volume.
My test data is not the same y-sheared cuboid I want to achieve, but it illustrates the issue of both graph_objs.

Test Data:
Using plotly_express.scatter_3d() for comparison, the following dataframe shows both Figures rendering the expected result:

DF = pd.DataFrame(data={
    'x': [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1,1,1,1,1,1],
    'y': [0,0,0,1,1,1,0,0,0,1,1,1],
    'z': [0,1,2,0,1,2,0,1,2,0,1,2],
    'val': [1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1]})

scatter plot:
points

volume plot:
points volume

When removing 2 points at (0/1/2) & (1/1/2) -

DF = pd.DataFrame(data={
    'x': [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1,1,1,1,1],
    'y': [0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,1,1],
    'z': [0,1,2,0,1,0,1,2,0,1],
    'val': [1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1]})
  • go.Volume breaks.

scatter plot:
scattermissing

volume plot:
vol missing

scatter_3d figure:

px.scatter_3d(
    DF,
    x='x',
    y='y',
    z='z',
    color='val',
    opacity=0.5,
    color_continuous_scale=px.colors.sequential.Inferno_r,
    range_color=[df.min()['val'], df.max()['val']],
    template=templ)

opacity doesn't take lists/ranges, so I can't use DF.val there.

Volume figure:

go.Figure(data=go.Volume(
    x=DF.x,
    y=DF.y,
    z=DF.z,
    value=DF.val,
    opacity=0.3,
    surface_count=17,
    colorscale=px.colors.sequential.Inferno_r
))

I played around with surface_count, but it doesn't seem to be causing the problem.

My 2 points being:

  • go.Volume/.isosurface don't work if angles of !=90° are involved
  • px.scatter_3d deserves some more configuration-options, especially opacity-wise

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Reproduce the supplied plotly_express.scatter_3d and go.Volume examples, including the complete and missing-point datasets. Start with the go.Volume and go.Isosurface entry points and compare their behavior for sheared coordinates and missing points. Done should establish whether these inputs are supported and resolve or clearly document the observed rendering limitation.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python
Domain
data-visualization
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
35/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.