plotly / plotly/plotly.R

ggplotly: geom_histogram(aes(fill = ...)) + facet_*() results in tooltip NAs

Aperta
#1,383 0 commenti 0 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub

Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.

ggplotly
Lingua principale
R
Stelle
2.7k
Fork
641
Metriche di merge delle PR
Nessuna PR unita negli ultimi 30g

Descrizione

I noticed a bug when trying to use ggplotly on a geom_histogram with fill in the aes and facet_*. I was able to recreate it on a simple example using mtcars. (I am using ggplot2 v 3.0.0 and plotly v 4.8.0.) I looked through the issues and it seems similar to #693.

This is the plot I am trying to use ggplotly on:

library(ggplot2)
library(dplyr)
library(plotly)
tp_na <- mtcars %>% mutate(cyl = as.factor(cyl)) %>%
  ggplot() + 
  geom_histogram(aes(x = carb, fill = cyl), binwidth = 1) + 
  facet_grid(.~vs)
tp_na

static plot

Using ggplotly, the values of the tooltip for the x-axis variable are all NA:

ggplotly(tp_na)

tooltip NA

(There is one exception to the NA in this reprex. The first red bar in the left facet has the correct value. The rest are NA. But, the same is not true for the plot in which I first encountered this problem.)

My workaround is:

tp <- mtcars %>% mutate(cyl = as.factor(cyl), carb= as.factor(carb)) %>%
  ggplot() + 
  geom_bar(aes(x = carb, fill = cyl))  +
  facet_grid(.~vs)
ggplotly(tp)

tooltip is fine

But, I would prefer to use geom_histogram(binwitdth = 1) for because the x-axis values for my desired plot are days (0, 1, 2, ..., 21), and I like the histogram for that better than the bar chart.

I tried a few other plots to see if what could possibly be causing the error:

# remove binwidth arg. still see NAs in tooltip
tp_na2 <- mtcars %>% mutate(cyl = as.factor(cyl)) %>%
  ggplot() + 
  geom_histogram(aes(x = carb, fill = cyl)) + 
  facet_grid(.~vs)
ggplotly(tp_na2)
# using a more continuous variable. still see NAs.
tp_na3 <- mtcars %>% mutate(cyl = as.factor(cyl)) %>%
  ggplot() + 
  geom_histogram(aes(x = qsec, fill = cyl)) + 
  facet_wrap(~vs)
ggplotly(tp_na3)
# add a text aes() to force x label to show. In tooltip, there are two entries for x, both correct
tp2 <- mtcars %>% mutate(cyl = as.factor(cyl)) %>%
  ggplot() + 
  geom_histogram(aes(x = carb, fill = cyl, text = paste("Carb:", carb)), binwidth = 1) + 
  facet_grid(.~vs)
ggplotly(tp2)
# no facets, it works as expected
tp3 <- mtcars %>% mutate(cyl = as.factor(cyl)) %>%
  ggplot() + 
  geom_histogram(aes(x = carb, fill = cyl), binwidth = 1) 
ggplotly(tp3)
# no fill, it works as expected
tp4 <- mtcars %>% mutate(cyl = as.factor(cyl)) %>%
  ggplot() + 
  geom_histogram(aes(x = carb), binwidth = 1) + 
  facet_grid(.~vs)
ggplotly(tp4)

screen shot 2018-10-31 at 1 26 30 pm

# adding just carb as the text aes results in multiple NAs in the tooltip
tp5 <- mtcars %>% mutate(cyl = as.factor(cyl)) %>%
  ggplot() + 
  geom_histogram(aes(x = carb, fill = cly, text = carb), binwidth = 1) + 
  facet_grid(.~vs)
ggplotly(tp5)

As you can see in the examples, facet_grid vs. facet_wrap doesn't seem to make a difference. There must be something about the fill + facet combo that goes wonky. I find it especially interesting that adding the text inside aes seems to work, but then I have double labels. I hope this is helpful for others. 🤷‍♀️

Guida per i contributori

Apri la guida per i contributori

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Direzione di ricerca

Inizia eseguendo il reprex mtcars fornito con ggplot2, plotly, geom_histogram, fill e facet_grid o facet_wrap, quindi confrontalo con il workaround indicato e con i casi senza facets o fill. Il lavoro è completato quando i tooltip dell’istogramma mostrano i valori dell’asse x invece di NAs, mantenendo il comportamento di faceting e fill.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Valutazione

Stack tecnologico
r
Ambito
data-visualization
Tipo di issue
Bug
Difficoltà
4/5
Tempo stimato
3-5 giorni
Stato di attività
Ferma
Chiarezza
Abbastanza chiara
Idoneità per principianti
35/100

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.