php / php/php-src

opcache.dups_fix is honored for duplicate classes but not duplicate functions

Abierto
#22,214 0 comentarios 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.

Bug Extension: opcache Status: Needs Triage
Lenguaje dominante
C
Estrellas
40.4k
Forks
8.1k
Merge medio
2 d 13 h
PR fusionados (30 d)
96

Descripción

Description

opcache.dups_fix is documented as a fix for "Cannot redeclare" errors, but it only covers classes, not functions.

Inside opcache the directive is read in the table-copy that installs a cached script's symbols (ext/opcache/zend_accelerator_util_funcs.c). The class-table copy honors it — when ignore_dups is set it keeps the existing class and skips the duplicate:

/* _zend_accel_class_hash_copy */
} else if (UNEXPECTED(!ZCG(accel_directives).ignore_dups)) {
    ...
    zend_class_redeclaration_error(E_ERROR, Z_PTR_P(t));
    return;
}
continue; /* ignore_dups: keep the first definition */

The function-table copy right next to it doesn't check the directive at all — it goes straight to the fatal:

/* _zend_accel_function_hash_copy */
t = zend_hash_find_known_hash(target, p->key);
if (UNEXPECTED(t != NULL)) {
    goto failure; /* -> "Cannot redeclare function ..." regardless of opcache.dups_fix */
}

So with opcache.dups_fix=1 a duplicate class is tolerated (first wins) but a duplicate function still fatals. The directive name and docs don't distinguish between the two, so this reads like an oversight rather than something intentional.

Where it bites

Long-running application servers that re-execute require_once'd files per request (we ran into this building ZealPHP, an OpenSwoole-based runtime). opcache re-installs a cached script's symbols into a table that already has them; dups_fix covers the class collision, but the function collision still kills the request with "Cannot redeclare function". So dups_fix only half-solves it for these setups — WordPress for example gets past its class redeclares with dups_fix=1 but then dies on the first function (_wp_can_use_pcre_u in wp-includes/compat.php).

Suggested fix

Make the function copy consistent with the class copy:

 		t = zend_hash_find_known_hash(target, p->key);
 		if (UNEXPECTED(t != NULL)) {
-			goto failure;
+			/* Honor opcache.dups_fix for functions too — the class-table
+			 * copy above already does. Keep the first-declared function. */
+			if (!ZCG(accel_directives).ignore_dups) {
+				goto failure;
+			}
+			continue;
 		}

I've tested this against 8.4 and it does the job (WordPress runs clean under opcache + a per-request re-execution model with it). Happy to open a PR with a .phpt if the asymmetry is agreed to be unintended — mostly wanted to check whether it's deliberate before sending one.

PHP Version

PHP 8.4 (the code is the same on master)

Operating System

Linux

Guía de contribución

Abrir la guía de contribución

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Línea de trabajo

Empieza en ext/opcache/zend_accelerator_util_funcs.c y compara _zend_accel_function_hash_copy con _zend_accel_class_hash_copy, centrándote en cómo se gestiona ignore_dups. Añade una prueba .phpt para funciones duplicadas con opcache.dups_fix habilitado y verifica que allí se toleran los duplicados, mientras que el caso con la directiva deshabilitada sigue informando del error de redeclaración.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Evaluación

Stack tecnológico
c, php
Área
backend
Tipo de issue
Error
Dificultad
3/5
Tiempo estimado
1-2 días
Estado de actividad
Tranquilo
Claridad
Bien especificado
Aptitud para principiantes
78/100

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.