SHM_PROTECT/SHM_UNPROTECT race in opcache under ZTS with multiple threads and protect_memory=1
まだ誰も着手していません。
- 主要言語
- C
- スター
- 40.4k
- フォーク
- 8.2k
- 平均マージ
- 2日 13時間
- マージ済み PR(30日)
- 96
説明
Description
When multiple PHP threads run concurrently in the same process (ZTS build), opcache's SHM_PROTECT()/SHM_UNPROTECT() calls race with each other because mprotect() is process-global, but there is no coordination (refcounting) between threads.
I'm not 100% sure this is a bug vs. a known limitation. But the behavior is surprising and I wanted to report it for discussion.
What happens
SHM_PROTECT() calls mprotect(shm, PROT_READ) and SHM_UNPROTECT() calls mprotect(shm, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE). These are process-wide — they affect all threads.
In ZEND_RINIT_FUNCTION(zend_accelerator) (ZendAccelerator.c, lines 2714–2778), every php_request_startup() executes an SHM_UNPROTECT() / SHM_PROTECT() pair. In a multi-threaded ZTS process, each thread calls php_request_startup() independently.
When tracing JIT is enabled and compiling a hot trace, it also holds SHM unprotected (zend_jit_trace.c, line 7512). If a second thread's RINIT calls SHM_PROTECT() while the first thread is still writing to SHM inside JIT compilation, the first thread gets SIGSEGV (write to read-only page).
Timeline:
Main thread Worker thread
─────────── ─────────────
zend_jit_compile_root_trace:
zend_shared_alloc_lock()
SHM_UNPROTECT() ← PROT_READ|WRITE
writing to zend_jit_traces[N]... php_request_startup():
... RINIT(accel):
... SHM_UNPROTECT() ← no-op
... ...checks restart_pending...
... SHM_PROTECT() ← mprotect(PROT_READ)
... done, returns
t->code_start = start → SIGSEGV
(page is now read-only)
The zend_shared_alloc_lock() serializes JIT compilation between threads, but it does NOT prevent RINIT's SHM_PROTECT() from running concurrently — RINIT doesn't acquire that lock for its SHM_UNPROTECT/PROTECT pair.
How to reproduce
Any ZTS setup with multiple threads running PHP code concurrently + opcache.protect_memory=1 + opcache.jit=tracing.
Minimal reproduction with TrueAsync threads (but should be reproducible with any ZTS threading extension — parallel, pmmpthread, etc.):
<?php
use Async\ThreadPool;
use function Async\spawn;
use function Async\await;
spawn(function() {
$pool = new ThreadPool(2);
$future = $pool->submit(fn() => 42);
echo await($future) . "\n";
$pool->close();
echo "Done\n";
});
Run with:
php -d opcache.enable_cli=1 \
-d opcache.jit=tracing \
-d opcache.jit_buffer_size=64M \
-d opcache.protect_memory=1 \
-d opcache.jit_hot_loop=1 \
-d opcache.jit_hot_func=1 \
test.php
Result: correct output 42\nDone followed by SIGSEGV in zend_jit_trace_add_code (zend_jit_trace.c:227).
The crash does NOT happen with:
opcache.protect_memory=0(default) —mprotectis never called, no raceopcache.jit=function— functions are compiled before threads start, no runtime compilation during concurrent execution
Notes
- The
krakjoe/parallelextension has the same architecture (callsphp_request_startup()per thread) and avoids this by only testing withopcache.jit=functionoropcache.jit=disablein CI. Their ASAN+JIT job explicitly uses-d opcache.jit=function. run-tests.phphardcodesopcache.protect_memory=1(line 300), so any multi-threaded test suite usingrun-tests.phpwith tracing JIT will hit this.- The underlying issue is that
mprotect()is process-global butSHM_UNPROTECT/PROTECTpairs are not coordinated across threads — there is no refcount to prevent one thread'sPROTECTfrom overriding another thread's activeUNPROTECTwindow.
PHP Version
PHP 8.6.0-dev (cli) (ZTS DEBUG)
Zend Engine v4.6.0-dev
with Zend OPcache v8.6.0-dev
Operating System
Ubuntu 24.04 (Linux 6.17)
コントリビューションガイド
はじめの一歩
- issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
- 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
- リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
- issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。
調査の方向性
まず ZendAccelerator.c の 2714–2778 行にある SHM_PROTECT/SHM_UNPROTECT のペアから始め、次に zend_jit_trace.c の 7512 行付近にある JIT ウィンドウと、227 行目のクラッシュ箇所を調べます。提供されている TrueAsync スクリプトと tracing-JIT オプションを使用して、ZTS ビルドで再現してください。完了とは、並行テストが SIGSEGV に到達しなくなり、適切なリグレッションカバレッジが特定されていることです。
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
評価
- 技術スタック
- c, php
- 領域
- backend, performance
- issue の種類
- バグ
- 難易度
- 4/5
- 見積もり時間
- 3〜5日
- 活発さ
- 静か
- 明瞭さ
- おおむね明確
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 38/100