Make it easier to reliably test data observers

In my experience, testing data observers is somewhat brittle. Even with explicit transactions I sometimes get "delayed" notifications that have been triggered by the previous operation.

Let's take this test (ObjectBox 2.2.0 + RxJava 2):

boxStore.runInTx {
    boxStore.boxFor(SomeEntity::class.java).put(SomeEntity())
}

val testObserver = TestObserver.create<Optional<SomeEntity>>()

boxStore.runInTx {
    repository.find(123).subscribeWith(testObserver)
}

testObserver.awaitCount(1)
testObserver.assertValueCount(1)

Sometimes, I get a value count of 2 from the original put operation. For completeness, the code of the find() method:

fun find(id: Long): Observable<Optional<SomeEntity>> {
    return Observable.create { emitter ->
        val query = this.boxStore.boxFor(SomeEntity::class)
            .query()
            .equal(SomeEntity_.id, id)
            .build()

        query.subscribe().observer { result ->
            emitter.onNext(result.firstOrNull().toOptional())
        }
    }
}

Assuming I did not misunderstand the docs or misuse the ObjectBox API, it would be great if ObjectBox could offer some method e.g. to block until all notifications triggered by the last transaction have been issued.

Inizia con la sequenza runInTx, TestObserver e query.subscribe().observer mostrata nell’issue, quindi esamina il comportamento dei data observer e delle transazioni di ObjectBox che essa esercita. Il lavoro è completato quando esiste un modo affidabile per attendere le notifiche della transazione precedente, dimostrato da un test che riceve costantemente l’unico valore previsto.