Make it easier to reliably test data observers

In my experience, testing data observers is somewhat brittle. Even with explicit transactions I sometimes get "delayed" notifications that have been triggered by the previous operation.

Let's take this test (ObjectBox 2.2.0 + RxJava 2):

boxStore.runInTx {
    boxStore.boxFor(SomeEntity::class.java).put(SomeEntity())
}

val testObserver = TestObserver.create<Optional<SomeEntity>>()

boxStore.runInTx {
    repository.find(123).subscribeWith(testObserver)
}

testObserver.awaitCount(1)
testObserver.assertValueCount(1)

Sometimes, I get a value count of 2 from the original put operation. For completeness, the code of the find() method:

fun find(id: Long): Observable<Optional<SomeEntity>> {
    return Observable.create { emitter ->
        val query = this.boxStore.boxFor(SomeEntity::class)
            .query()
            .equal(SomeEntity_.id, id)
            .build()

        query.subscribe().observer { result ->
            emitter.onNext(result.firstOrNull().toOptional())
        }
    }
}

Assuming I did not misunderstand the docs or misuse the ObjectBox API, it would be great if ObjectBox could offer some method e.g. to block until all notifications triggered by the last transaction have been issued.

Comienza con la secuencia runInTx, TestObserver y query.subscribe().observer mostrada en el issue; después, revisa el comportamiento de los observadores de datos y las transacciones de ObjectBox que esta secuencia ejercita. Se considera terminado cuando exista una forma fiable de esperar las notificaciones de la transacción anterior, demostrada mediante una prueba que reciba de forma consistente el único valor esperado.