sqlite: excess bound parameters produce an opaque "column index out of range" error
まだ誰も着手していません。
- 主要言語
- JavaScript
- スター
- 122k
- フォーク
- 37.3k
- 平均マージ
- 4日 2時間
- マージ済み PR(30日)
- 283
説明
Version
v24.15.0 (also present on main)
Platform
Darwin 25.6.0 arm64 (platform-independent — pure BindParams logic)
Subsystem
sqlite
What steps will reproduce the bug?
const { DatabaseSync } = require('node:sqlite');
const db = new DatabaseSync(':memory:');
db.exec('CREATE TABLE t(a)');
const ins = db.prepare('INSERT INTO t VALUES (?)');
ins.run(1, 2); // ERR_SQLITE_ERROR, errcode 25, "column index out of range"
db.prepare('SELECT 1').get(5); // same
Any excess anonymous argument reproduces it, regardless of type — 2, 'x', and null all give the identical message.
How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?
Always, whenever the number of anonymous arguments exceeds the statement's sqlite3_bind_parameter_count().
What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?
An error naming the actual problem — that more parameters were supplied than the statement accepts, ideally with both counts. Something like:
TypeError [ERR_INVALID_ARG_COUNT]: Statement accepts 1 parameter, but 2 were provided.
Two reasons this matters:
-
The message describes the wrong thing. "Column index out of range" is SQLite's wording for a binding index, but to a JS caller "column" reads as a table column, pointing them at their schema rather than their call site. Nothing in the message indicates an argument-count mismatch.
-
It's inconsistent with how the adjacent failure is reported. A wrong-type argument gets a precise Node-authored error:
ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE: Provided value cannot be bound to SQLite parameter 2.A wrong-count argument falls through to a raw SQLite error code. Both are caller mistakes in the same call, caught in the same function.
What do you see instead?
ERR_SQLITE_ERROR with errcode: 25 and message column index out of range.
Additional information
The anonymous-binding loop in StatementSync::BindParams (src/node_sqlite.cc) iterates args from anon_start to args.Length() without comparing that span against sqlite3_bind_parameter_count(), so the overflow surfaces from sqlite3_bind_* instead. param_count is already fetched a few lines above, inside the bare-named-params block. A pre-loop guard would cover every excess-argument case at once.
Worth deciding up front whether this should throw at all, or ignore extra arguments the way ordinary JS functions do. Throwing seems better for a database API, and it's the current behavior, so a guard would preserve semantics while fixing only the message. Note this would be a breaking change for anyone matching on ERR_SQLITE_ERROR/errcode 25, so it likely wants semver-major treatment.
Surfaced while reviewing #62008, which changes undefined handling in the same function; the two are independent.
コントリビューションガイド
はじめの一歩
- issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
- 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
- リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
- issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。
調査の方向性
src/node_sqlite.cc の StatementSync::BindParams から始め、既存の param_count の処理と anonymous-binding ループを確認します。提示された SQL スニペットで問題を再現します。余分な匿名引数が SQLite errcode 25 ではなく、明確なパラメーター数エラーを報告し、既存の binding 動作を変更しなければ完了です。
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
評価
- 技術スタック
- javascript, node.js, sqlite
- 領域
- databases
- issue の種類
- バグ
- 難易度
- 3/5
- 見積もり時間
- 1〜2日
- 活発さ
- 静か
- 明瞭さ
- 明確に書かれている
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 68/100