tls: add support for Encrypted Client Hello (ECH) — tracking (OpenSSL 4.0 / master)
まだ誰も着手していません。
- 主要言語
- JavaScript
- スター
- 122k
- フォーク
- 37.3k
- 平均マージ
- 4日 2時間
- マージ済み PR(30日)
- 283
説明
What is the problem this feature will solve?
Node.js has no support for Encrypted Client Hello (ECH). The node:tls module (and everything built on it, including undici/fetch) always sends the SNI in plaintext, so applications cannot make TLS connections with an encrypted ClientHello the way modern browsers (Firefox, Chrome) already do.
There was a previous tracking issue for this, #31618 ("tls: Encrypted Client Hello (ECH)"), but it was auto-closed by the stale bot in Oct 2022 due to inactivity — not because it was implemented. At that time the feature was explicitly blocked on OpenSSL, per the maintainers:
"ESNI is still in draft ... can't be supported by Node.js until OpenSSL supports it."
Status of the upstream dependency
ECH is now standardized as RFC 9849 (March 2026), and OpenSSL's ECH tracking issue openssl/openssl#7482 was closed as completed on 2026-03-04 (merge openssl/openssl#30086). Per the closing comment:
"ECH support for this RFC will be in OpenSSL 4.0 and is already in the master branch."
So the important nuance: ECH is in OpenSSL master, targeting the 4.0 release — it is not in the 3.5 line that Node currently bundles. This request is therefore not immediately actionable; it is a tracking issue for when Node bundles an OpenSSL that includes ECH (4.0+). Filing it now so the requirement is captured, since the old #31618 is stale-closed.
What is the feature you are proposing to solve the problem?
Once Node bundles an OpenSSL with ECH (4.0+), expose that ECH API through node:tls. Concretely:
- A
tls.connect()option to supply the config material, e.g.echConfigList(aBuffercontaining the server'sECHConfigList), mirroring OpenSSL'sSSL_ech_set1_echconfig()/SSL_CTX_ech_set1_echconfig(). - A way to surface the ECH outcome after the handshake (accepted / rejected / retry-config), e.g. via
SSL_ech_get1_status(), so callers can distinguish real ECH from GREASE. - Optionally, resolver integration so the
ECHConfigListfrom aHTTPS/SVCBDNS RR can be used (browsers fetch it from DNS). Could start with a caller-supplied config and add DNS integration later.
Consumers like undici/fetch would then inherit ECH support.
What alternatives have you considered?
- Shelling out to an ECH-enabled
curlbuild — requires a custom curl build and loses the native API. - A native N-API addon calling
SSL_ech_*— Node's bundled OpenSSL (3.5.x) doesn't include ECH, so this needs a rebuilt Node against OpenSSL 4.0/master. - Driving a headless browser — far too heavy and doesn't measure a clean protocol-level request.
None of these are a substitute for first-class support in node:tls.
Related
- Previous (stale-closed) tracking issue: #31618
- Upstream OpenSSL ECH (targeting 4.0 / in master): https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/7482
コントリビューションガイド
はじめの一歩
- issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
- 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
- リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
- issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。
調査の方向性
この issue では Node.js のソースファイルもテストも指定されていません。バンドルされた依存関係が利用可能になったら、node:tls tls.connect API と OpenSSL 4.0 ECH APIs から着手してください。完了の条件は、Node が合意された呼び出し元提供の ECH 設定とハンドシェイク結果を公開し、DNS 統合を最終的なスコープに従って扱うことです。
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
評価
- 技術スタック
- javascript, nodejs
- 領域
- networking, security
- issue の種類
- 機能追加
- 難易度
- 5/5
- 見積もり時間
- 1週間以上
- 活発さ
- 静か
- 明瞭さ
- おおむね明確
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 35/100