Increased CPU utilization after upgrading from Node.js v20.20.0 to v22.x
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- JavaScript
- Sterne
- 122k
- Forks
- 37.3k
- Ø Merge
- 4 T. 2 Std.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 283
Beschreibung
Version
v22.22.0 / v22.22.2 / 24.15.0
Platform
Oracle Linux 8 latest
Subsystem
No response
What steps will reproduce the bug?
- Run workload on Node.js v20.20.0 → CPU ~68–70%
- Upgrade to Node.js v22.22.x or 24.15.0
- Run identical workload (same TPS, config)
- Observe CPU increase (~86–88%)
- Revert to v20 → CPU returns to baseline
How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?
consistently 100% reproducable
What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?
no bigger than 5% CPU degradation
What do you see instead?
20% CPU degradation
Additional information
We are observing a significant increase in CPU utilization after upgrading our runtime from Node.js v20.20.0 → v22.x (22.22.x), with no application-level changes.
A/B testing strongly indicates the regression is tied to the Node.js runtime upgrade rather than application logic.
Impact
- ~20% relative CPU increase observed
- Consistent across multiple test runs
- No functional regression, but clear performance degradation
Environment
- Node.js versions:
- v20.20.0 (baseline)
- v22.22.0 / v22.22.2
- Workload:
- High-throughput service (~17–18K TPS)
- Distributed/multi-node setup
- Runtime flags:
--max-semi-space-size=256--max-old-space-size=3072
Observed Behavior
| Scenario | Node Version | CPU Utilization |
|---|---|---|
| Baseline | v20.20.0 | ~68–70% |
| Upgraded runtime | v22.22.x | ~86–88% |
v22.x + --max-semi-space-size=16 |
v22.22.x | ~88% |
| Reverted runtime | v20.20.0 | ~68% |
Key Findings
-
Strong correlation with Node.js version
- Reverting v22 → v20 reduces CPU by ~12–20%
- No application changes between runs
-
Memory tuning did not help
- Adjusting
--max-semi-space-sizeshowed no improvement - Lower values increased GC frequency without reducing CPU
- Adjusting
-
Latest v22 versions do not fix the issue
- Testing with v22.22.2 shows same behavior
-
Maglev likely not the cause
- Disabled by default in Node ≥22.9.0
- Issue persists on versions where Maglev is disabled
What Was Ruled Out
- Application-level regression
- Load/TPS variation
- GC tuning via semi-space adjustments
- Early v22-only issues
Suspected Cause
Likely related to runtime-level changes introduced in Node.js v22, such as:
- V8 upgrade (v11.x → v12.x)
- JIT execution changes
- GC or memory management differences
- libuv / stream internal changes
Reproduction Steps (High-level)
- Run workload on Node.js v20.20.0 → CPU ~68–70%
- Upgrade to Node.js v22.22.x
- Run identical workload (same TPS, config)
- Observe CPU increase (~86–88%)
- Revert to v20 → CPU returns to baseline
Additional Notes
- No explicit Node.js release notes mention this regression
- Issue is reproducible under high throughput
- Not observed in lower TPS environments (≤5–7K TPS)
##Questions##
- Are there known CPU regressions or behavior changes in Node.js v22 / V8 12.x?
- Are there recommended runtime flags or GC tuning options for high-throughput workloads in v22?
- Any guidance on mitigating CPU increase when upgrading from v20 → v22?
- Will an upgrade to the latest available version of Node.js v26 fix this issue?
Beitragsleitfaden
Erste Schritte
- Lies das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreib ins Issue, dass du es übernimmst — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forke das Repository und arbeite in einem Branch.
- Öffne einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Rechercherichtung
Beginne damit, die gemeldete Workload mit hohem Durchsatz unter Node.js v20.20.0 und v22.22.x unter Oracle Linux 8 mit den aufgeführten Speicher-Flags zu reproduzieren, wobei TPS und Konfiguration identisch bleiben. Vergleiche die CPU-Auslastung und dokumentiere eine minimale, reproduzierbare Workload oder isoliere die für die Laufzeitänderung verantwortliche Ursache; im Issue werden keine Quelldateien oder Tests genannt.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- javascript, linux, node.js
- Bereich
- backend, performance
- Issue-Typ
- Bug
- Schwierigkeit
- 5/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- Über eine Woche
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Aktiv
- Klarheit
- Muss geklärt werden
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 35/100