nodejs / nodejs/node

Recommend `node`/`default` conditions instead of `require`/`import` as a solution to the dual package hazard

未关闭
#52,174 14 条评论 6 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

doc
主要语言
JavaScript
星标
122k
派生
37.4k
平均合并
4 天 3 小时
30 天内合并 PR
272

描述

Affected URL(s)

https://nodejs.org/api/packages.html#dual-package-hazard

Description of the problem

Publishing packages with dual CommonJS and ESM sources, while has the benefits of supporting both CJS consumers and ESM-only platforms, is known to cause problems because Node.js might load both versions. Example:

package.json foo.cjs foo.mjs
{
  "name": "foo",
  "exports": {
    "require": "./foo.cjs",
    "import": "./foo.mjs"
  }
}
exports.object = {};     
export const object = {};     
package.json bar.js
{
  "name": "bar",
  "main": "./bar.js"
}
const foo = require("foo");
exports.object = foo.object;     
// my app

import { object as fooObj } from "foo";
import { object as barObj } from "bar";

console.log(fooObj === barObj); // false?????

The two suggested solutions boil down to "even when you have an ESM entrypoint, still use only CJS internallly". This solves the dual package hazard, but completely defeats the cross-platform benefits of dual modules.

If foo instead used these export conditions:

{
  "name": "foo",
  "exports": {
    "node": "./foo.cjs",
    "default": "./foo.mjs"
  }
}

Then:

  • there would be no dual-package hazard in Node.js, because it only ever loads the CommonJS version
  • there would be no dual-package hazard in bundlers, because they would only ever load either the node version (if they are configured to target Node.js) or the default version (if they are configured to target other platforms).
  • the package solves the dual-package hazard while still providing an ESM-only version

We have been using this node/default pattern in @babel/runtime for a couple years, because we wanted to provide an ESM-only version for browsers while still avoiding the dual-package hazard (@babel/runtime is mostly stateless, but @babel/runtime/helpers/temporalUndefined relies on object identity of an object defined in a separate file).

贡献指南

打开贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

调研方向

从 nodejs.org/api/packages.html#dual-package-hazard 中受影响的“Dual package hazard”部分开始,并结合此 issue 中的 node/default 提案,审阅现有的建议解决方案。达成对该建议的一致意见,并准确更新该文档部分(包括此处所述的 CommonJS 和 ESM 行为)后,即视为完成。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

评估

技术栈
javascript, node.js
领域
documentation
Issue 类型
文档
难度
3/5
预计耗时
1-2 天
活跃度
冷清
描述清晰度
基本清楚
新手友好度
52/100

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。