nodeSolidServer / nodeSolidServer/node-solid-server

Authorization options

未關閉
#1,240 2 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視

還沒有人認領這個 Issue。

主要語言
JavaScript
星號
1.8k
分支
308
PR 合併指標
30 天內沒有已合併 PR

描述

Please describe what you did in reproducible steps

In the new Authorization dialog in NSS 5.1.4, there are 4 options that can be selected which equate to different application 'modes':

  1. Read all documents in the Pod (Read)
  2. Add data to existing documents, and create new documents (Write)
  3. Modify and delete data in existing documents, and delete documents (Append)
  4. Give other people and apps access to the Pod, or revoke their (and your) access (Control)

So my questions/comments:

  • Reading these options, it seems that 2) is a combination of Create and Update, and 3) is a combination of Update and Delete. Why can't a user be set to only have Update access?
  • This trusted app information is written to a user's public profile. Seems like this is not information that should be shared publicly. For example, I would not want to publicise that I use an app that is related to a specific medical condition, or an illegal activity. Is there a more appropriate place this information can be written as it should not be public information.

貢獻指南

開啟貢獻指南

從這裡開始

  1. 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
  3. Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
  4. 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。

研究方向

先重現 NSS 5.1.4 所描述的 Authorization dialog 行為,並追蹤受信任應用程式資訊儲存在 public profile 的哪個位置。與維護者確認是否需要 Update-only access,以及授權中繼資料應存放在哪裡;當兩項決定都已記錄且約定的行為已實作時,即視為完成。

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。

評估

技術堆疊
javascript
領域
authorization, security
Issue 類型
功能
難度
5/5
預估耗時
一週以上
活躍度
停滯
描述清晰度
需要釐清
新手友好度
25/100

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。