Appropriate Forum For PR Priorities?

未关闭
#141 6 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
新手友好度
20/100
Issue 类型
文档
描述清晰度
需要澄清
活跃度
停滞
技术栈
cpp, python
领域
developer-experience

调研方向

首先查看 pull request #107 和 #138，以及此 issue 中的六条评论，以了解所请求的决策和任何疑虑。当维护者给出明确的“是/否”决定，或提供关于应如何推进这些更改的书面指导时，该 issue 即完成。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

There are a couple of PRs that are very little code, but quite useful:
https://github.com/nmwsharp/polyscope/pull/107
https://github.com/nmwsharp/polyscope/pull/138

I've tried to figure out what the best way to get a YES/NO on these is. I'm unsure if they're just going to be ignored or if there are some issues they bring up that should be discussed.

I know it's a lot of work to manage open source projects. I'd like to be as helpful as possible and not add to the maintenance burden. How can I help move these forward?

Some background ... I've been using Polyscope from Python a lot the last few months and have built a number of extensions. I'd like to work the changes into master to the degree that it makes sense so that I don't have to constantly keep managing my fork as master moves forward. Any guidance as to how to participate is welcome. Thank you for the excellent library!

I'm using it for 5-axis CNC machining applications:
Screen Shot 2021-09-22 at 10 04 26 AM

主要语言
C++
星标
2.2k
派生
242
平均合并
11 分钟
30 天内合并 PR
1

贡献指南

这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue，再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库，在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request，并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

nmwsharp/polyscope 的其他 Issue

查看 nmwsharp/polyscope 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 C++ Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。