neurostuff / neurostuff/autonima

Determine why apples-to-apples annotation in social meta-analysis is still not great

Open
#39 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

evaluation
Dominant language
Python
Stars
4
Forks
1
Avg merge
12h 56m
Merged PRs (30d)
2

Description

  • Try using nimads analyses as inputs
  • Implement fuzzy matching of analyzes based on coordinates
  • Assess Parsing and Annotation steps separately

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by using nimads analyses as inputs and assess the Parsing and Annotation steps separately. Define completion around explaining why apples-to-apples annotation remains weak and evaluating fuzzy matching of analyses by coordinates.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python
Domain
data
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.