modelcontextprotocol / modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk
In-process callback failures break tool calls and notification sends
還沒有人認領這個 Issue。
- 主要語言
- Python
- 星號
- 24.3k
- 分支
- 4k
- 平均合併
- 1 天 1 小時
- 30 天內合併 PR
- 31
描述
Initial Checks
- I confirm that I am using the newest release of the 2.x line.
- I confirm that I searched the issue tracker before opening this issue.
Release line
2.x (current stable)
Description
Client(server) uses DirectDispatcher. If a progress callback raises, that exception crosses back into server tool execution, so a tool that otherwise returns successfully fails with UnexpectedToolError. DirectDispatcher also lets an inbound notification handler exception escape back to the sender's notify() call.
The stream-backed JSONRPCDispatcher logs and contains both callback failures. I expected the in-process path to keep the same boundary: log the callback failure, but let the protocol operation continue.
I have a small patch and regression tests for both paths and would like to fix this if maintainers want an outside pull request.
I used GitHub Copilot CLI to inspect the dispatcher paths, write the patch, and draft this report. I verified the reproduction and tests.
Example Code
import anyio
from mcp import Client
from mcp.server.mcpserver import Context, MCPServer
server = MCPServer("callback-repro")
@server.tool()
async def work(context: Context) -> str:
await context.report_progress(1, 1)
return "done"
async def broken_progress(progress: float, total: float | None, message: str | None) -> None:
raise RuntimeError("consumer failed")
async def main() -> None:
async with Client(server, mode="2026-07-28") as client:
result = await client.call_tool("work", progress_callback=broken_progress)
print(result.content[0].text)
anyio.run(main)
Current main ends with:
UnexpectedToolError: Error executing tool work
The tool should print done. The callback failure should still be logged.
Verification
With only the regression tests applied to clean main:
uv run --frozen pytest tests/shared/test_dispatcher.py \
-k 'progress_callback_exception_does_not_fail_request or notification_handler_exception_does_not_reach_sender' -q
# 2 failed, 2 passed. Both DirectDispatcher cases failed.
With the two callback guards applied:
uv run --frozen pytest tests/shared/test_dispatcher.py \
-k 'progress_callback_exception_does_not_fail_request or notification_handler_exception_does_not_reach_sender' -q
# 4 passed
Python & MCP Python SDK
Python 3.12.13
mcp 2.1.1
mcp 2.1.2.dev4+d060b36e at d060b36e1d095ef6e93e07ba5d59bb69b2ad449a
macOS
貢獻指南
從這裡開始
- 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
- Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
- 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。
研究方向
從 DirectDispatcher 路徑著手,將其回呼失敗處理與串流支援的 JSONRPCDispatcher 進行比較。使用提到的兩個 -k 案例執行 tests/shared/test_dispatcher.py,以重現這些失敗。完成的標準是兩個 DirectDispatcher 案例都通過,成功的工具呼叫和通知傳送持續正常運作,且回呼失敗會被記錄。
由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。
評估
- 技術堆疊
- python
- 領域
- backend-api-design
- Issue 類型
- 缺陷
- 難度
- 3/5
- 預估耗時
- 1-2 天
- 活躍度
- 活躍
- 描述清晰度
- 描述清楚
- 新手友好度
- 84/100