modelcontextprotocol / modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk
streamable-http client: no size bound before JSONRPCMessage.model_validate_json — one large server message can OOM the client
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Python
- Estrellas
- 24.3k
- Forks
- 4k
- Merge medio
- 1 d 1 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 31
Descripción
Summary
StreamableHTTPTransport parses every inbound SSE event and JSON response body with JSONRPCMessage.model_validate_json / model_validate_json(content) and no size bound. Because pydantic validation of a large JSON document allocates several times the wire size in live Python objects, a single oversized message from a server can exhaust the client's memory. There is no hook to inspect or reject a message before it is parsed.
We hit this in production: a client connected to ~30 MCP servers, one of which answered tools/list with a 21.9 MB single SSE event. Measured with tracemalloc at the parse site:
#1 663.4 MB in 9,957,044 blocks
mcp/client/streamable_http.py:217
message = JSONRPCMessage.model_validate_json(sse.data)
#2 46.9 MB in 3 blocks
httpx_sse/_decoders.py:61 (whole event buffered as one string)
#3 46.9 MB in 2 blocks
httpx_sse/_decoders.py:120 (copy from slicing)
Roughly a 7× amplification of the wire size in live objects, transient but concurrent with other parses. A trivial request that triggered only catalogue loading peaked at 2.35 GB RSS from a 56 MB baseline; heavier concurrent work reached 4.2 GB. Removing that one server dropped the same request's peak to 456 MB. Versions: mcp 1.27.1, Python 3.14.
Why a client-side bound is needed
The client cannot know in advance that a server will return a huge payload, and a misbehaving or misconfigured server should not be able to OOM its client. Today the only outcome is process death with nothing identifying the responsible server — the failure surfaces as an unexplained kill rather than an actionable error.
What we did as a workaround, and why it was awkward
We wrapped StreamableHTTPTransport._handle_sse_event and _handle_json_response to measure sse.data / the response body and reject anything over a configured cap before parsing. Two things made this harder than expected, and both seem worth addressing upstream:
- Raising from the handler is not viable. Every call site wraps it in
except Exception: logger.debug(...)and then reconnects withLast-Event-ID, which replays the same oversized payload. The raise is swallowed and the pending request hangs. - Delivering a bare
Exceptionon the read stream does not fail the request either. InBaseSession._receive_loop,isinstance(message, Exception)routes to_handle_incoming, which for the default message handler is a no-op; only aJSONRPCResponse/JSONRPCErrormatching_response_streams[request_id]completessend_request, and that awaits withtimeout=None. To fail the request we had to synthesize aJSONRPCErrorand recover the request id from the raw payload with a regex, since parsing it is exactly what we were trying to avoid.
Suggested improvements
- An optional client-side maximum message size (constructor argument and/or environment variable) enforced before
model_validate_json, on both the SSE andapplication/jsonpaths. - When it trips, fail the corresponding pending request with a distinct error identifying the endpoint and the observed size, rather than letting the reconnect path replay the payload.
- Failing that, a documented hook to inspect a raw message before parsing would let clients implement this without patching private methods.
- Independently:
_handle_sse_eventreturningFalsefor a parse failure causes the caller to treat the stream as ended and reconnect withLast-Event-ID; for a deterministic failure (such as a payload that will always be too large, or malformed JSON) this retries something that cannot succeed.
Happy to open a PR if a maintainer indicates the preferred shape (constructor arg vs. env var vs. pre-parse hook).
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Línea de trabajo
Empieza en mcp/client/streamable_http.py, en el punto de análisis de SSE alrededor de la línea 217, e inspecciona _handle_sse_event y _handle_json_response para ambas rutas de entrada. Después, lee BaseSession._receive_loop y _handle_incoming para entender el manejo de errores de las solicitudes pendientes. La tarea estará terminada cuando los mensajes demasiado grandes se rechacen antes de model_validate_json, la solicitud correspondiente falle con un error útil y la reconexión no vuelva a reproducir la carga útil.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Evaluación
- Stack tecnológico
- python
- Área
- api, networking
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 48/100