modelcontextprotocol / modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk
Authentication in High Level MCPServer
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 24.3k
- 派生
- 4k
- 平均合并
- 1 天 1 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 31
描述
Question
I'm trying to understand the authentication model in the new MCP Python SDK v2.
I want to implement the simplest possible authentication for a remote Streamable HTTP MCP server:
- The server has a pre-configured bearer token.
- The client sends
Authorization: Bearer <token>. - The server verifies the token.
- If valid, the MCP request is allowed.
- There is no OAuth login flow and no Authorization Server involved.
I initially tried using TokenVerifier:
class StaticTokenVerifier(TokenVerifier):
async def verify_token(self, token: str) -> AccessToken | None:
if token == ACCESS_TOKEN:
return AccessToken(token=token)
return None
However, MCPServer requires AuthSettings whenever a token_verifier is supplied. AuthSettings in my version requires both issuer_url and resource_server_url.
I don't understand why issuer_url is required for this use case. There is no Authorization Server issuing the token—the token is simply pre-configured on the MCP server.
Adding AuthSettings also appears to cause the client to enter the OAuth discovery/authorization flow. For example, I encountered:
The connection is now reaching the OAuth authorization step,
but this server does not implement an /authorize endpoint.
I also encountered a protected-resource URL validation error when the URL differed only by localhost vs 127.0.0.1:
Protected resource [http://localhost:10000/mcp] does not match expected
[http://127.0.0.1:10000/mcp] (or origin)
My understanding is that TokenVerifier and the OAuth discovery/authorization-server configuration are separate concerns. The low-level SDK code appears to support BearerAuthBackend(token_verifier) independently, while resource_server_url is used for protected-resource metadata.
Is there a supported way in MCP Python SDK v2 to implement simple bearer-token authentication for Streamable HTTP without configuring an OAuth Authorization Server and without having to implement or manually compose Starlette middleware?
In other words, I'm looking for the equivalent of:
HTTP Request
↓
Authorization: Bearer alice-token
↓
TokenVerifier
↓
valid → MCP request
invalid → 401
without requiring:
Authorization Server
↓
/authorize
/token
OAuth discovery
issuer_url
resource_server_url
Is this supported by the high-level MCPServer API, or is OAuth intentionally a prerequisite for using TokenVerifier?
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
调研方向
从高层 MCPServer 身份验证配置开始,并将其与 issue 中描述的 BearerAuthBackend 和 TokenVerifier 低层路径进行比较。追踪为什么需要 AuthSettings、issuer_url 和 resource_server_url;确定了一种受支持的配置,或确认了一个明确的 API 缺口,即表示完成。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- python
- 领域
- api, authentication, backend-api-design
- Issue 类型
- 功能
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 活跃度
- 冷清
- 描述清晰度
- 需要澄清
- 新手友好度
- 38/100