modelcontextprotocol / modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk

Authentication in High Level MCPServer

未关闭
#3,283 3 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

P3 question v1 v2
主要语言
Python
星标
24.3k
派生
4k
平均合并
1 天 1 小时
30 天内合并 PR
31

描述

Question

I'm trying to understand the authentication model in the new MCP Python SDK v2.

I want to implement the simplest possible authentication for a remote Streamable HTTP MCP server:

  1. The server has a pre-configured bearer token.
  2. The client sends Authorization: Bearer <token>.
  3. The server verifies the token.
  4. If valid, the MCP request is allowed.
  5. There is no OAuth login flow and no Authorization Server involved.

I initially tried using TokenVerifier:

class StaticTokenVerifier(TokenVerifier):
    async def verify_token(self, token: str) -> AccessToken | None:
        if token == ACCESS_TOKEN:
            return AccessToken(token=token)

        return None

However, MCPServer requires AuthSettings whenever a token_verifier is supplied. AuthSettings in my version requires both issuer_url and resource_server_url.

I don't understand why issuer_url is required for this use case. There is no Authorization Server issuing the token—the token is simply pre-configured on the MCP server.

Adding AuthSettings also appears to cause the client to enter the OAuth discovery/authorization flow. For example, I encountered:

The connection is now reaching the OAuth authorization step,
but this server does not implement an /authorize endpoint.

I also encountered a protected-resource URL validation error when the URL differed only by localhost vs 127.0.0.1:

Protected resource [http://localhost:10000/mcp] does not match expected
[http://127.0.0.1:10000/mcp] (or origin)

My understanding is that TokenVerifier and the OAuth discovery/authorization-server configuration are separate concerns. The low-level SDK code appears to support BearerAuthBackend(token_verifier) independently, while resource_server_url is used for protected-resource metadata.

Is there a supported way in MCP Python SDK v2 to implement simple bearer-token authentication for Streamable HTTP without configuring an OAuth Authorization Server and without having to implement or manually compose Starlette middleware?

In other words, I'm looking for the equivalent of:

HTTP Request
     ↓
Authorization: Bearer alice-token
     ↓
TokenVerifier
     ↓
valid → MCP request
invalid → 401

without requiring:

Authorization Server
    ↓
/authorize
/token
OAuth discovery
issuer_url
resource_server_url

Is this supported by the high-level MCPServer API, or is OAuth intentionally a prerequisite for using TokenVerifier?

贡献指南

打开贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

调研方向

从高层 MCPServer 身份验证配置开始,并将其与 issue 中描述的 BearerAuthBackend 和 TokenVerifier 低层路径进行比较。追踪为什么需要 AuthSettings、issuer_url 和 resource_server_url;确定了一种受支持的配置,或确认了一个明确的 API 缺口,即表示完成。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

评估

技术栈
python
领域
api, authentication, backend-api-design
Issue 类型
功能
难度
4/5
预计耗时
3-5 天
活跃度
冷清
描述清晰度
需要澄清
新手友好度
38/100

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。