modelcontextprotocol / modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk

Authentication in High Level MCPServer

Abierto
#3,283 3 comentarios 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.

P3 question v1 v2
Lenguaje dominante
Python
Estrellas
24.3k
Forks
4k
Merge medio
1 d 1 h
PR fusionados (30 d)
31

Descripción

Question

I'm trying to understand the authentication model in the new MCP Python SDK v2.

I want to implement the simplest possible authentication for a remote Streamable HTTP MCP server:

  1. The server has a pre-configured bearer token.
  2. The client sends Authorization: Bearer <token>.
  3. The server verifies the token.
  4. If valid, the MCP request is allowed.
  5. There is no OAuth login flow and no Authorization Server involved.

I initially tried using TokenVerifier:

class StaticTokenVerifier(TokenVerifier):
    async def verify_token(self, token: str) -> AccessToken | None:
        if token == ACCESS_TOKEN:
            return AccessToken(token=token)

        return None

However, MCPServer requires AuthSettings whenever a token_verifier is supplied. AuthSettings in my version requires both issuer_url and resource_server_url.

I don't understand why issuer_url is required for this use case. There is no Authorization Server issuing the token—the token is simply pre-configured on the MCP server.

Adding AuthSettings also appears to cause the client to enter the OAuth discovery/authorization flow. For example, I encountered:

The connection is now reaching the OAuth authorization step,
but this server does not implement an /authorize endpoint.

I also encountered a protected-resource URL validation error when the URL differed only by localhost vs 127.0.0.1:

Protected resource [http://localhost:10000/mcp] does not match expected
[http://127.0.0.1:10000/mcp] (or origin)

My understanding is that TokenVerifier and the OAuth discovery/authorization-server configuration are separate concerns. The low-level SDK code appears to support BearerAuthBackend(token_verifier) independently, while resource_server_url is used for protected-resource metadata.

Is there a supported way in MCP Python SDK v2 to implement simple bearer-token authentication for Streamable HTTP without configuring an OAuth Authorization Server and without having to implement or manually compose Starlette middleware?

In other words, I'm looking for the equivalent of:

HTTP Request
     ↓
Authorization: Bearer alice-token
     ↓
TokenVerifier
     ↓
valid → MCP request
invalid → 401

without requiring:

Authorization Server
    ↓
/authorize
/token
OAuth discovery
issuer_url
resource_server_url

Is this supported by the high-level MCPServer API, or is OAuth intentionally a prerequisite for using TokenVerifier?

Guía de contribución

Abrir la guía de contribución

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Línea de trabajo

Comienza con la configuración de autenticación de alto nivel de MCPServer y compárala con la ruta de bajo nivel de BearerAuthBackend y TokenVerifier descrita en el issue. Comprueba por qué AuthSettings, issuer_url y resource_server_url son necesarios; se considera terminado cuando se identifica una configuración compatible o se confirma una carencia concreta de la API.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Evaluación

Stack tecnológico
python
Área
api, authentication, backend-api-design
Tipo de issue
Nueva funcionalidad
Dificultad
4/5
Tiempo estimado
3-5 días
Estado de actividad
Tranquilo
Claridad
Necesita aclaración
Aptitud para principiantes
38/100

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.