modelcontextprotocol / modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk

mcp.server.fastmcp.FastMCP HTTP transport deadlocks after ~5 sequential client sessions on Windows (companion to PrefectHQ/fastmcp#4192)

オープン
#2,653 コメント 3 件 リアクション 0 件 担当者 0 名 GitHub で見る

まだ誰も着手していません。

bug needs repro
主要言語
Python
スター
24.3k
フォーク
4k
平均マージ
1日 1時間
マージ済み PR(30日)
31

説明

mcp.server.fastmcp.FastMCP HTTP transport deadlocks after ~5 sequential client sessions on Windows (companion to PrefectHQ/fastmcp#4192)

Summary

Filing here as a companion to PrefectHQ/fastmcp#4192, which contains the full investigation, cross-control matrix, stack-dump evidence, and minimal reproducers. The reason for the companion issue: the bug reproduces on Anthropic's mcp.server.fastmcp.FastMCP shipped inside this SDK, faster than on PrefectHQ's downstream fork, and the SDK maintainers should see the signal directly rather than having to chase a downstream cross-reference.

The one-line result that's yours

A 30-sequential-session driver running against an HTTP server built with mcp.server.fastmcp.FastMCP 1.27.1 on Windows + Python 3.14 hangs at session #5, with gradual slowdown visible from session #4 onwards. The same driver against PrefectHQ fastmcp.FastMCP 3.3.1 hangs at session #12; against raw mcp.server.lowlevel.Server it passes 30/30; against the Node.js TypeScript reference server (@modelcontextprotocol/server-everything) it passes 30/30.

That is: this SDK's FastMCP wrapper exhibits the defect more aggressively than the downstream fork, and the SDK's own lower-level surface is unaffected.

Cross-control matrix (excerpt; full matrix in PrefectHQ/fastmcp#4192)

Server Python Sessions before hang
mcp.server.fastmcp.FastMCP 1.27.1 3.14 5
mcp.server.fastmcp.FastMCP 1.27.1 3.13.7 12
fastmcp.FastMCP 3.3.1 (PrefectHQ) 3.14 12
mcp.server.lowlevel.Server + StreamableHTTPSessionManager 3.14 30/30 ✅
@modelcontextprotocol/server-everything (Node.js streamableHttp) n/a 30/30 ✅

Python-version variance rules out a 3.14 regression. The Node.js control rules out a protocol-level defect. The raw-SDK control rules out the SDK's lower-level transport.

Mechanism (per stack-dump evidence in #4192)

python -m asyncio ps <PID> on the hung server process shows multiple Task entries (one per "closed" session) parked in TaskGroup.__aexit__, all with child tasks named sse_starlette.sse.EventSourceResponse.__call__.<locals>.cancel_on_finish blocked in Event.wait / sleep on _ping, _listen_for_disconnect, _stream_response, and the SDK's standalone_sse_writer.

mcp.server.fastmcp.FastMCP.create_streamable_http_app instantiates EventSourceResponse from sse_starlette as part of its ASGI app construction. The raw mcp.server.lowlevel.Server path writes text/event-stream directly via its own ASGI write loop without ever instantiating EventSourceResponse — which is why it isn't affected. The defect is in the wrapper layer's interaction with sse_starlette, not the SDK's core transport.

Reproducers

Two minimal reproducers in the PrefectHQ issue: one for PrefectHQ FastMCP, one for raw SDK (the passing control). A third targeting mcp.server.fastmcp.FastMCP directly is trivially derivable — same shape, different import — and I'm happy to add it here if useful.

Why the cap is lower on this SDK's wrapper

Working hypothesis (not yet verified): mcp.server.fastmcp.FastMCP and PrefectHQ's fastmcp.FastMCP use slightly different sse_starlette integration shapes. Either version-pin differences, or an extra layer of session-lifecycle handling in one wrapper that creates more orphan tasks per session, would explain why the threshold lands at 5 here vs 12 downstream. Confirming this would need a side-by-side diff of the two wrappers' create_streamable_http_app paths and sse_starlette versions, which I haven't done.

Platform / environment

  • Windows 11 (ProactorEventLoop)
  • Python 3.14 and 3.13.7
  • mcp 1.27.1 (the SDK that ships mcp.server.fastmcp.FastMCP)
  • Linux not validated — PrefectHQ's public CI runs Linux + Python 3.12 where epoll-based loop semantics may drain orphan tasks faster. Maintainer Linux validation requested in #4192; same request stands here.

The question for SDK maintainers

Is mcp.server.fastmcp.FastMCP considered an actively-maintained surface that the SDK team will fix, or is it a thin reference wrapper where PrefectHQ's fork is the canonical production target? The answer changes where the fix should land and whether this issue stays open here or gets closed in favour of #4192.

If it's in-scope here, the cross-controls in #4192 already narrow the surface to "EventSourceResponse integration in the FastMCP wrapper layer." The raw SDK path is the working reference.

Workaround for users of this SDK

Migrate from mcp.server.fastmcp.FastMCP to mcp.server.lowlevel.Server + manually-constructed StreamableHTTPSessionManager + Starlette + uvicorn. ~1 day's mechanical rewrite for a server with ~7 tools. Empirically 30/30 sessions passing on the same workload.

コントリビューションガイド

コントリビューションガイドを開く

はじめの一歩

  1. issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
  2. 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
  3. リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
  4. issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。

調査の方向性

mcp.server.fastmcp.FastMCP.create_streamable_http_app から調査を開始し、EventSourceResponse との統合を確認します。動作する対照として raw の mcp.server.lowlevel.Server パスを使用してください。Windows で逐次セッションがハングする問題を再現し、ラッパーの挙動を PrefectHQ/fastmcp#4192 の証拠と比較します。繰り返しセッションを実行した後、終了したセッションが孤立したタスクを残さず、デッドロックもしなくなった時点で、この問題は解決したものとします。

索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。

評価

技術スタック
python
領域
api, backend, networking
issue の種類
バグ
難易度
4/5
見積もり時間
3〜5日
活発さ
静か
明瞭さ
おおむね明確
初心者へのやさしさ
42/100

新しい issue をメールで受け取る

初心者向けの GitHub issue を短くまとめたダイジェスト。