StdioClientTransport should support bounded child process termination

StdioClientTransport starts and manages a child MCP server process. During graceful shutdown, the SDK transport currently calls process.destroy() and waits for process.onExit().

That works when the child process responds to SIGTERM, but it can hang indefinitely if the child process ignores termination or becomes stuck. Downstream, we had to implement a custom McpClientTransport to ensure proxied MCP server processes are always cleaned up when the parent shuts down.

Current behavior

The current shutdown flow is effectively:

if (this.process != null) {
  this.process.destroy();
  return Mono.fromFuture(process.onExit());
}

There is no configurable timeout and no fallback to destroyForcibly().

Expected behavior

StdioClientTransport.closeGracefully() should support bounded process termination:

1. Stop accepting new messages.
2. Complete the transport sinks.
3. Send graceful termination with process.destroy().
4. Wait up to a configurable timeout.
5. If the process is still alive, call process.destroyForcibly().
6. Dispose the transport schedulers.

This guarantees that child MCP server processes do not survive parent shutdown indefinitely.

Proposed fix

Add a configurable process termination timeout to StdioClientTransport, with a sensible default.

Conceptually:

process.destroy();

return Mono.fromFuture(process.onExit())
  .timeout(processTerminationTimeout, Mono.defer(() -> {
    if (process.isAlive()) {
      process.destroyForcibly();
    }
    return Mono.fromFuture(process.onExit());
  }));

This could be exposed through the existing ServerParameters builder or a dedicated StdioClientTransport constructor/builder option.

Suggested regression test

Add a test with a child process that ignores SIGTERM or does not exit promptly.

The test should verify that:

1. closeGracefully() completes within the configured timeout plus a small buffer.
2. The child process is no longer alive after closeGracefully() completes.
3. The transport schedulers and sinks are cleaned up.

Beginne bei StdioClientTransport.closeGracefully() und untersuche, wie ServerParameters den Transport konfiguriert und wie auf process.onExit() gewartet wird. Füge ein konfigurierbares Beendigungs-Timeout hinzu und führe dann den vorgeschlagenen Regressionstest mit einem Kindprozess aus, der SIGTERM ignoriert, oder füge ihn hinzu. Fertig ist es, wenn das Herunterfahren innerhalb des Timeout-Puffers abgeschlossen wird, ein weiterhin laufender Kindprozess zwangsweise beendet wird und Scheduler sowie Sinks bereinigt werden.