modelcontextprotocol / modelcontextprotocol/java-sdk
Missing `@JsonIgnoreProperties(ignoreUnknown = true)` on capability sub-records
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 3.7k
- Forks
- 1.1k
- Avg merge
- 1d 15h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 9
Description
Bug description
The top-level ClientCapabilities and ServerCapabilities records have @JsonIgnoreProperties(ignoreUnknown = true), but their nested sub-records do not. Since the ObjectMapper is constructed with default settings (FAIL_ON_UNKNOWN_PROPERTIES = true), any unknown field on a capability sub-object causes a deserialization failure.
This already caused a real breakage when the elicitation capability gained form and url fields (#724, fixed in #731), but the systemic issue remains — the next spec addition to any capability sub-object will break older SDK versions again.
Affected records
In McpSchema.java:
| Record | Line | Has annotation? |
|---|---|---|
ClientCapabilities |
383 | Yes |
RootCapabilities |
397 | Yes |
Sampling |
410 | No |
Elicitation |
437 | No |
Elicitation.Form |
443 | No |
Elicitation.Url |
450 | No |
ServerCapabilities |
535 | Yes |
CompletionCapabilities |
548 | No |
LoggingCapabilities |
555 | No |
PromptCapabilities |
565 | No |
ResourceCapabilities |
576 | No |
ToolCapabilities |
587 | No |
Spec reference
The spec schema explicitly states capabilities are not a closed set:
"Known capabilities are defined here, in this schema, but this is not a closed set: any client can define its own, additional capabilities."
ClientCapabilities in schema.json — additionalProperties: false is never set on any capability object or sub-object. Several sub-capabilities (sampling, elicitation, completions, logging) explicitly set additionalProperties: true.
Expected behavior
Unknown fields on capability sub-objects should be silently ignored, matching the behavior of the top-level ClientCapabilities and ServerCapabilities records.
Related
- #734 — reports the same issue for
ToolCapabilitiesspecifically - #724 / #731 — the elicitation breakage that was fixed by adding fields, not by adding the annotation
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start in mcp-core/src/main/java/io/modelcontextprotocol/spec/McpSchema.java and review the listed capability records, comparing them with ClientCapabilities and ServerCapabilities. Done means unknown fields on every affected capability sub-record are ignored during deserialization, including nested elicitation records.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- java
- Domain
- api
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Newbie friendliness
- 55/100