microsoft / microsoft/durabletask-java
Add Durable Task middleware support
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
- Lingua principale
- Java
- Stelle
- 29
- Fork
- 18
- Merge medio
- 1g 10h
- PR unite (30g)
- 2
Descrizione
Summary
Track adding SDK-level Durable Task middleware support to the Java SDK, aligned with the .NET reference implementation.
Reference spec: https://github.com/microsoft/durabletask-dotnet/blob/feature/durable-task-middleware/doc/cross-sdk-middleware.md
.NET user guide: https://github.com/microsoft/durabletask-dotnet/blob/feature/durable-task-middleware/doc/durable-task-middleware.md
Motivation: https://github.com/Azure/azure-functions-durable-extension/issues/3054
The spec may shift until the .NET v1 implementation is merged. This issue is intended to track the Java design and implementation work so it can follow the same durable middleware contract with idiomatic API names.
Proposed shape
Names are illustrative, not final API commitments.
workerBuilder.useOrchestrationMiddleware((ctx, next) -> {
if (!ctx.isReplaying()) {
logger.info("starting orchestration {}", ctx.getInstanceId());
}
return next.invoke(ctx);
});
workerBuilder.useActivityMiddleware((ctx, next) -> {
Optional<Object> cached = cache.tryGet(ctx.getName(), ctx.getInput());
if (cached.isPresent()) {
ctx.setResult(cached.get());
return CompletableFuture.completedFuture(null);
}
return next.invoke(ctx);
});
Design points to cover
- Builder-level registration APIs for orchestration and activity middleware.
- Registration ordering: first registered middleware runs outermost and unwinds last.
- Context interfaces that expose durable task name, instance ID, version/parent/tags where available, input, raw input where available, replay state for orchestrations, features, and result after
next. - A feature collection keyed by
Class<T>or another type-safe Java abstraction. - Integration with dependency injection frameworks where present, without requiring a particular DI container.
- Orchestration middleware determinism guidance for replay, including replay-safe logging and avoiding nondurable
CompletableFuture/threading usage, wall-clock time, random values, file/network I/O, and mutable process state. - Activity middleware short-circuiting through an explicit
setResultAPI. - Host integration pattern for Azure Functions or other hosts to attach invocation context through features instead of durable middleware depending on host middleware internals.
Acceptance criteria
- Orchestration and activity middleware APIs are exposed at the durable worker/builder level.
- Middleware executes in registration order and unwinds in reverse order.
- Orchestration middleware must call
next.invoke(ctx)exactly once when completing successfully; missing or duplicate calls are rejected where feasible. - Activity middleware can call
next.invoke(ctx)once or short-circuit only throughctx.setResult(...); duplicatenextis invalid. - Host-specific objects can be passed through features without serialization into durable history.
- Documentation covers replay determinism and the difference between durable middleware and host/Functions middleware.
- Tests cover registration ordering, context population, feature access, orchestration next-call validation, and activity short-circuiting.
- No wire protocol or protobuf changes are required.
- Entity middleware is out of scope for v1.
Guida per i contributori
Apri la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Direzione di ricerca
Inizia leggendo la specifica del middleware cross-SDK collegata e la guida utente .NET, quindi esamina le API di durable worker/builder in questo Java SDK. Usa i punti di ingresso proposti per il middleware di orchestration e activity per mappare il design, incluse le funzionalità del contesto e le regole di validazione. Il lavoro è completo quando sono implementati i test di accettazione elencati, la documentazione e l’integrazione delle funzionalità dell’host, senza modifiche a wire o protobuf.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Valutazione
- Stack tecnologico
- java
- Ambito
- backend-api-design
- Tipo di issue
- Funzionalità
- Difficoltà
- 5/5
- Tempo stimato
- Più di una settimana
- Stato di attività
- Tranquilla
- Chiarezza
- Abbastanza chiara
- Idoneità per principianti
- 35/100