microsoft / microsoft/durabletask-java
Add Durable Task middleware support
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Java
- Estrellas
- 29
- Forks
- 18
- Merge medio
- 1 d 10 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 2
Descripción
Summary
Track adding SDK-level Durable Task middleware support to the Java SDK, aligned with the .NET reference implementation.
Reference spec: https://github.com/microsoft/durabletask-dotnet/blob/feature/durable-task-middleware/doc/cross-sdk-middleware.md
.NET user guide: https://github.com/microsoft/durabletask-dotnet/blob/feature/durable-task-middleware/doc/durable-task-middleware.md
Motivation: https://github.com/Azure/azure-functions-durable-extension/issues/3054
The spec may shift until the .NET v1 implementation is merged. This issue is intended to track the Java design and implementation work so it can follow the same durable middleware contract with idiomatic API names.
Proposed shape
Names are illustrative, not final API commitments.
workerBuilder.useOrchestrationMiddleware((ctx, next) -> {
if (!ctx.isReplaying()) {
logger.info("starting orchestration {}", ctx.getInstanceId());
}
return next.invoke(ctx);
});
workerBuilder.useActivityMiddleware((ctx, next) -> {
Optional<Object> cached = cache.tryGet(ctx.getName(), ctx.getInput());
if (cached.isPresent()) {
ctx.setResult(cached.get());
return CompletableFuture.completedFuture(null);
}
return next.invoke(ctx);
});
Design points to cover
- Builder-level registration APIs for orchestration and activity middleware.
- Registration ordering: first registered middleware runs outermost and unwinds last.
- Context interfaces that expose durable task name, instance ID, version/parent/tags where available, input, raw input where available, replay state for orchestrations, features, and result after
next. - A feature collection keyed by
Class<T>or another type-safe Java abstraction. - Integration with dependency injection frameworks where present, without requiring a particular DI container.
- Orchestration middleware determinism guidance for replay, including replay-safe logging and avoiding nondurable
CompletableFuture/threading usage, wall-clock time, random values, file/network I/O, and mutable process state. - Activity middleware short-circuiting through an explicit
setResultAPI. - Host integration pattern for Azure Functions or other hosts to attach invocation context through features instead of durable middleware depending on host middleware internals.
Acceptance criteria
- Orchestration and activity middleware APIs are exposed at the durable worker/builder level.
- Middleware executes in registration order and unwinds in reverse order.
- Orchestration middleware must call
next.invoke(ctx)exactly once when completing successfully; missing or duplicate calls are rejected where feasible. - Activity middleware can call
next.invoke(ctx)once or short-circuit only throughctx.setResult(...); duplicatenextis invalid. - Host-specific objects can be passed through features without serialization into durable history.
- Documentation covers replay determinism and the difference between durable middleware and host/Functions middleware.
- Tests cover registration ordering, context population, feature access, orchestration next-call validation, and activity short-circuiting.
- No wire protocol or protobuf changes are required.
- Entity middleware is out of scope for v1.
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Línea de trabajo
Comienza leyendo la especificación de middleware entre SDK enlazada y la guía de usuario de .NET; después, inspecciona las APIs de durable worker/builder en este Java SDK. Usa los puntos de entrada propuestos para el middleware de orchestration y activity para plasmar el diseño, incluidas las funcionalidades de contexto y las reglas de validación. Se considera terminado cuando estén implementadas las pruebas de aceptación indicadas, la documentación y la integración de las funcionalidades del host, sin cambios en wire ni protobuf.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Evaluación
- Stack tecnológico
- java
- Área
- backend-api-design
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Estado de actividad
- Tranquilo
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 35/100