microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
Syntactic checks against comparing to null/undefined in strictNullChecks mode
Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.
- Langage dominant
- Go
- Étoiles
- 111k
- Forks
- 14.4k
- Merge moyen
- 1 j 19 h
- PR mergées (30 j)
- 117
Description
🔍 Search Terms
nullish, strictNullChecks, equals, undefined, null
✅ Viability Checklist
- This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
- This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
- This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
- This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, new syntax sugar for JS, etc.)
- This isn't a request to add a new utility type: https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/wiki/No-New-Utility-Types
- This feature would agree with the rest of our Design Goals: https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/wiki/TypeScript-Design-Goals
⭐ Suggestion
When strictNullChecks are enabled, disallow == and === comparisons to null/undefined for expressions that are syntactically known to not be undefined.
I'd imagine the definition of syntactically not null/undefined expressions would be similar to that from https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/pull/59217.
This is similar to https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/11920, but I think would be easier to land because it won't error on defensive programming null checks.
📃 Motivating Example
TypeScript's typeof operator always returns a string, but it can be hard to spot the difference between checking "undefined" and just undefined in code like this:
if (typeof foo === undefined) {
In strictNullChecks mode, TypeScript will catch unnecessary comparisons like this, for expressions that at runtime it knows can never be null or undefined.
💻 Use Cases
- What do you want to use this for? catch user errors
- What shortcomings exist with current approaches? there's the https://typescript-eslint.io/rules/no-unnecessary-condition/, but that's type-based so does have the problem of flagging defensive programming. it's also nice to have things be in the compiler instead of a separate tool.
- What workarounds are you using in the meantime? nothing at the moment, if this is infeasible will probably create a custom lint check.
Guide de contribution
Ouvrir le guide de contribution
Par où commencer
- Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
- Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
- Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
- Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.
Piste de recherche
Examinez le comportement proposé avec l’issue #11920 et la pull request #59217, qui définissent des approches connexes pour les expressions syntaxiquement connues comme non nullish. Le travail est considéré comme terminé lorsque strictNullChecks signale les comparaisons null/undefined inutiles demandées sans modifier le JavaScript généré ni le comportement à l’exécution.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Évaluation
- Stack technique
- typescript
- Domaine
- compilers
- Type d'issue
- Fonctionnalité
- Difficulté
- 5/5
- Temps estimé
- Plus d'une semaine
- Activité
- À l'abandon
- Clarté
- Plutôt claire
- Accessibilité débutants
- 35/100