Aliased optional chain calls don't narrow like their inline equivalents

🔎 Search Terms

aliased conditions control flow analysis cfa optional chain call

🕗 Version & Regression Information

• This is the behavior in every version I tried

⏯ Playground Link

https://www.typescriptlang.org/play/?ts=5.6.0-dev.20240704#code/GYVwdgxgLglg9mABAJwKYGc4BsBuqCMAFDACYBci6UyMYA5ogD6LgmrC2okCUiA3gChEiCAiqIY6AEKssXRAF4JJAPwA6WhCwg26QgCIA+gCNZXfdwDcQicETFpZnvxvDRYcVWQUvtBktJrYQBfAVCBUEhYBBQMbDwAJmJySmo-JhYwNg4wLl5BYRg7ZPVNbV0DEycLfNcRMShU7yb0gJIgxFDgoA

💻 Code

function resolve1(id: string | undefined) {
  const isBundled = id?.includes("_bundled");
  if (isBundled) {
    const str: string = id; // error
  }
}

function resolve2(id: string | undefined) {
  if (id?.includes("_bundled")) {
    const str: string = id; // ok
  }
}

🙁 Actual behavior

resolve1 errors within the if block

🙂 Expected behavior

I'd expect it to be OK. Just like resolve2 is OK with it here - the condition is exactly the same and TS supports Control Flow Analysis of Aliased Conditions and Discriminant since 4.4

Additional information about the issue

No response

Inizia con la riproduzione collegata in TypeScript Playground e confronta resolve1 con resolve2. Poi traccia l'analisi del flusso di controllo per le condizioni aliasate e le chiamate con optional chaining. Aggiungi o aggiorna un test di regressione che mostri che la condizione aliasata restringe id come la condizione inline e verifica che entrambe le assegnazioni di stringhe abbiano esito positivo.